Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: Fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis
2013608 citationsMuhammad Shahbaz, Saleheen Khan et al.Energy Economicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mohammad Iqbal Tahir
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammad Iqbal Tahir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammad Iqbal Tahir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammad Iqbal Tahir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammad Iqbal Tahir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammad Iqbal Tahir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammad Iqbal Tahir. The network helps show where Mohammad Iqbal Tahir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohammad Iqbal Tahir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohammad Iqbal Tahir.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohammad Iqbal Tahir based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mohammad Iqbal Tahir. Mohammad Iqbal Tahir is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Khan, Faisal, et al.. (2018). Role of Environmental Management Systems Certification, Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure in Firm’s Efficiency: A Comparison of ISO 14001 Certified and Non-Certified Firms in Pakistan. 9(1). 1–10.2 indexed citations
2.
Aljifri, Khaled, et al.. (2014). The Association between Firm Characteristics and Corporate Financial Disclosures: Evidence from UAE Companies. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia). 8(2). 101–123.44 indexed citations
Shahbaz, Muhammad, Saleheen Khan, & Mohammad Iqbal Tahir. (2013). The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: Fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Economics. 40. 8–21.608 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Islam, Faridul, Mohammad Iqbal Tahir, & Muhammad Shahbaz. (2012). Income terms of trade and trade balance: the long run evidence from Bangladesh. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 36(2). 109–122.3 indexed citations
7.
Kelly, G. Wayne & Mohammad Iqbal Tahir. (2009). Time Series and Cross-sectional Dynamics of Accounting Rate of Return and the Prediction of Cash Flow Per Ordinary Share. 15(2). 1.
Tahir, Mohammad Iqbal, et al.. (2001). Towards a Theory of Islamic Financial Reporting. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).3 indexed citations
13.
Hodgson, Allan, Mohammad Iqbal Tahir, John Okunev, & Roger J. Willett. (2000). Some further considerations applying to the modelling of the earnings/returns relationship. Asian Review of Accounting. 8. 21–32.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.