M.K. Mathew

4.1k citations
79 papers · 3.4k indexed · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

M.K. Mathew

77 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

M.K. Mathew
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Condensed Matter Physics 470
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 574
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 543
  • Plant Science 1.0k
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
Replace Daniel Lévy with:
Daniel Lévy France
Brett M. Collins Australia
Eberhard Unger Germany
John F. Cannon United States
Tadashi Satoh Japan
Gerhard Thiel Germany
Tomohiko Mori Japan
Keitaro Yamashita Japan
Toshihiko Oka Japan
Mitsuyoshi Saito Japan
M.K. Mathew relative to Daniel Lévy France Daniel Lévy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Daniel Lévy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.K. Mathew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.K. Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.K. Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.K. Mathew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.K. Mathew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.K. Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.K. Mathew. The network helps show where M.K. Mathew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.K. Mathew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.K. Mathew Line = papers co-authored together M.K. Mathew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992259
2 2008251
3 2009213
4 1991182
5 2011177
6 1993163
7 2003143
8 1988140
9 1989129
10 201993
11 201584
12 199382
13 198371
14 201571
15 199470
16 198868
17 199067
18 200563
19 198361
20 201256

About M.K. Mathew

M.K. Mathew is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Plant Science and Filtration and Separation, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (19 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (12 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (12 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (9 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (9 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (470 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (574 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (543 citations), Plant Science (1.0k citations) and Molecular Biology (1.5k citations). M.K. Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. D. Sarma, A. Chainani, Lukas Schreiber, Kosala Ranathunge, P. Balaram, Walther Stoeckenius, Cassandra L. Smith, Charles R. Cantor, Pannaga Krishnamurthy and Apurva Sarin. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, FEBS Letters, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026