M.J. Sulpizio

17 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

M.J. Sulpizio
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Reproductive Medicine 93
  • Genetics 111
  • Biophysics 36
  • Urology 37
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 107
Replace Pedro M. Aponte with:
Pedro M. Aponte Ecuador
Jaromír Vašíček Slovakia
Xiaoe Zhao China
Teoan Kim South Korea
Nicola Antonio Martino Italy
Huiming Ma China
Yumi Hoshino Japan
Zhou Zhou China
Seung‐Hoon Lee South Korea
Vlastimil Sršeň United Kingdom
M.J. Sulpizio relative to Pedro M. Aponte Ecuador Pedro M. Aponte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Pedro M. Aponte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.J. Sulpizio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.J. Sulpizio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.J. Sulpizio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.J. Sulpizio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.J. Sulpizio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.J. Sulpizio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.J. Sulpizio. The network helps show where M.J. Sulpizio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.J. Sulpizio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.J. Sulpizio Line = papers co-authored together M.J. Sulpizio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006124
2 201370
3 201052
4 201150
5 200432
6 200831
7 201423
8 201621
9 200820
10 200517
11 201415
12 20026
13 20086
14 20074
15 20032
16 20041
17 20121

About M.J. Sulpizio

M.J. Sulpizio is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Animal Science and Zoology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Physiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (3 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (2 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (2 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (2 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (93 citations), Genetics (111 citations), Biophysics (36 citations), Urology (37 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (107 citations). M.J. Sulpizio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Carmine Di Ilio, Fabrizio Di Giuseppe, Stefania Angelucci, Enrica Eleuterio, Gian Mario Tiboni, Franca Giampietro, Marco Marchisio, Domenico Ciavardelli, Paola Palumbo and Laura Pierdomenico. Their work appears in journals such as Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics, Journal of Animal Science, PLoS ONE, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact