Ming Zhong
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Oral Surgery top 2%
- Topics
- Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (34 papers)Bone and Dental Protein Studies (12 papers)Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Ming Zhong
133 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Molecular Biology 684
- Cancer Research 357
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 278
- Epidemiology 236
- Oral Surgery 191
Countries citing papers authored by Ming Zhong
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Zhong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Zhong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Zhong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Zhong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Zhong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Zhong. The network helps show where Ming Zhong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming Zhong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming Zhong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming Zhong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming Zhong. Ming Zhong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | [Risk factors of premature rupture of membranes with neonatal infection: a single-center study]. | 2 |
| 13 | Comparative analysis of diagnostic value of imaging of cervical cancers by B-ultrasonography,CT and MRI | 1 |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MOS-HIV among HIV-infected individuals receiving HAART | 1 |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | EFFECTS OF ASTRAGALUS POLYSACCHARIDE (APS) AND ASTRAGALUS FLAVONOIDS (AF) ON THE CYTOTOXICITY OF LAK AND NK CELLS IN NORMAL AND TUMOR BEARING MICE | 2 |
About Ming Zhong
Ming Zhong is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Biotechnology and Cancer Research, having authored 143 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (34 papers), Bone and Dental Protein Studies (12 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (191 citations), Cancer Research (357 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (278 citations). Ming Zhong has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Yun Zhang, Hong‐Wei Tan, Huiping Gong, Yan Guo, Xue Qiao, Yun Zhang, Zhihao Wang, Jinwen Liu, Xing Niu and Chao Shang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, PLoS ONE and Diabetes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.