Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance
2014874 citationsFrançois Schellevis, Ellen E. Stobberingh et al.BMC Infectious Diseasesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Pringle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Pringle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Pringle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Pringle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Pringle. The network helps show where Mike Pringle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Pringle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Pringle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Pringle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Pringle. Mike Pringle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hippisley–Cox, Julia, et al.. (2007). General practitioners’ attitudes towards theprovision of services to young people agedunder 16: a cross-sectional survey. Quality in primary care. 15(1). 11–19.2 indexed citations
4.
Pringle, Mike. (2007). The Doctor's Dilemma — 100 years on. British Journal of General Practice. 57(534). 76–76.1 indexed citations
Hippisley–Cox, Julia, et al.. (2004). Forging links: evolving attitudes of clinical governance leads in general practice. Quality in primary care. 12(1). 59–64.4 indexed citations
Hippisley–Cox, Julia & Mike Pringle. (2000). Inequalities in access to coronary angiography and revascularisation: the association of deprivation and location of primary care services.. PubMed. 50(455). 449–54.61 indexed citations
12.
Pringle, Mike, et al.. (1999). The PCG Development Guide.1 indexed citations
13.
Pringle, Mike. (1998). Primary care : core values.41 indexed citations
Pringle, Mike. (1991). GP REFERRALS TO HOSPITAL: A guide for family health services authorities. British Journal of General Practice. 41(350). 394–394.4 indexed citations
18.
Pringle, Mike. (1990). GP BUDGET HOLDING IN THE UK. British Journal of General Practice. 40(337). 354–354.1 indexed citations
Pringle, Mike. (1990). GP BUDGET HOLDING IN THE UK: Lessons from America. British Journal of General Practice. 40(337). 354–354.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.