Mikael Höök

7.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
83 papers, 5.6k citations indexed

About

Mikael Höök is a scholar working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Environmental Engineering and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mikael Höök has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 5.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, 33 papers in Environmental Engineering and 24 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Mikael Höök's work include Global Energy and Sustainability Research (52 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (29 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (18 papers). Mikael Höök is often cited by papers focused on Global Energy and Sustainability Research (52 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (29 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (18 papers). Mikael Höök collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, China and United Kingdom. Mikael Höök's co-authors include Xu Tang, Simon Davidsson, K. Aleklett, Hanna Vikström, Simon Snowden, Lianyong Feng, Henrik Wachtmeister, Jianliang Wang, Benjamin McLellan and Baosheng Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Journal of Cleaner Production and Applied Energy.

In The Last Decade

Mikael Höök

81 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Hit Papers

Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate chang... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 2013 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mikael Höök Sweden 39 1.9k 1.4k 1.2k 1.2k 870 83 5.6k
Dolf Gielen Netherlands 31 2.4k 1.2× 1000 0.7× 2.1k 1.7× 1.6k 1.4× 1.2k 1.3× 78 8.5k
Benjamin McLellan Japan 48 1.3k 0.7× 1.4k 1.0× 1.9k 1.5× 1.3k 1.1× 847 1.0× 170 7.5k
Kornelis Blok Netherlands 52 2.5k 1.3× 1.4k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 2.6k 2.2× 1.7k 1.9× 182 8.3k
Andrea Ramírez Netherlands 43 1.2k 0.6× 2.6k 1.9× 761 0.6× 2.3k 1.9× 669 0.8× 157 5.9k
Wim Turkenburg Netherlands 46 1.3k 0.7× 2.2k 1.6× 1.3k 1.0× 2.0k 1.7× 919 1.1× 102 7.0k
Michael E. Webber United States 53 1.4k 0.7× 723 0.5× 3.2k 2.6× 816 0.7× 384 0.4× 242 7.9k
Howard J. Herzog United States 34 1.8k 0.9× 3.0k 2.2× 996 0.8× 2.0k 1.7× 959 1.1× 100 7.1k
Adam R. Brandt United States 50 2.6k 1.4× 1.1k 0.8× 1.2k 0.9× 1.7k 1.5× 708 0.8× 164 7.1k
Troy R. Hawkins United States 35 1.1k 0.6× 743 0.5× 2.1k 1.7× 2.1k 1.8× 559 0.6× 105 5.7k
Alexandre Szklo Brazil 40 1.6k 0.9× 634 0.5× 1.2k 0.9× 1.5k 1.2× 988 1.1× 203 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Mikael Höök

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mikael Höök's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mikael Höök with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mikael Höök more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mikael Höök

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mikael Höök. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mikael Höök. The network helps show where Mikael Höök may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mikael Höök

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mikael Höök. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mikael Höök based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mikael Höök. Mikael Höök is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tang, Xu, et al.. (2024). Prospective metal requirements assessment of China's wind-power and photovoltaics: Implications for emerging anthropogenic mines. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 215. 108088–108088. 3 indexed citations
2.
Li, Nu, et al.. (2024). Methane emissions from the natural gas industry in China – A systematically accounting based on the bottom-up approach. Gas Science and Engineering. 126. 205346–205346. 7 indexed citations
3.
Wang, Wenhuan, et al.. (2023). Digital economy sectors are key CO2 transmission centers in the economic system. Journal of Cleaner Production. 407. 136873–136873. 21 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Wenhuan, et al.. (2022). Digital Economy Sectors are Key Co 2  Transmission Centers in the Economic System. SSRN Electronic Journal.
5.
Dong, Cong, et al.. (2020). Can the Shanghai LNG Price Index indicate Chinese market? An econometric investigation using price discovery theory. Frontiers in Energy. 14(4). 726–739. 11 indexed citations
6.
Zhang, Baosheng, et al.. (2017). Characteristic Production Decline Patterns for Shale Gas Wells in Barnett. 5(1). 12–21. 8 indexed citations
7.
Davidsson, Simon & Mikael Höök. (2017). Material requirements and availability for multi-terawatt deployment of photovoltaics. Energy Policy. 108. 574–582. 72 indexed citations
8.
Pargman, Daniel, et al.. (2017). What if there had only been half the oil? Rewriting history to envision the consequences of peak oil. Energy Research & Social Science. 31. 170–178. 17 indexed citations
9.
Feng, Lianyong, et al.. (2017). Emergy-based energy return on investment method for evaluating energy exploitation. Energy. 128. 540–549. 18 indexed citations
10.
Tokimatsu, Koji, Benjamin McLellan, Mikael Höök, et al.. (2017). Energy modeling approach to the global energy-mineral nexus: A case of fuel cell vehicle. Energy Procedia. 142. 2361–2364. 3 indexed citations
11.
Jin, Yi, Xu Tang, Cuiyang Feng, & Mikael Höök. (2017). Energy and water conservation synergy in China: 2007–2012. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 127. 206–215. 37 indexed citations
12.
Dong, Xiucheng, et al.. (2015). Sustainability Assessment of the Natural Gas Industry in China Using Principal Component Analysis. Sustainability. 7(5). 6102–6118. 21 indexed citations
13.
Davidsson, Simon, et al.. (2014). Phosphate rock production and depletion: Regional disaggregated modeling and global implications. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 93. 178–187. 106 indexed citations
14.
Wang, Jianliang, Lianyong Feng, Simon Davidsson, & Mikael Höök. (2013). Chinese coal supply and future production outlooks. Energy. 60. 204–214. 78 indexed citations
15.
Li, Junchen, Xiucheng Dong, Mikael Höök, Jian Gao, & Shiqun Li. (2013). Risk evaluation of technology innovation in China's oil and gas industry. International Journal of Global Energy Issues. 36(1). 1–1. 6 indexed citations
16.
Tang, Xu, Simon Snowden, & Mikael Höök. (2013). Analysis of energy embodied in the international trade of UK. Energy Policy. 57. 418–428. 65 indexed citations
17.
Vikström, Hanna, Simon Davidsson, & Mikael Höök. (2013). Lithium availability and future production outlooks. Applied Energy. 110. 252–266. 737 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Tang, Xu, Baosheng Zhang, Lianyong Feng, Simon Snowden, & Mikael Höök. (2012). Net oil exports embodied in China's international trade: An input–output analysis. Energy. 48(1). 464–471. 55 indexed citations
19.
Höök, Mikael, et al.. (2010). Validity of the Fossil Fuel Production Outlooks in the IPCC Emission Scenarios. Natural Resources Research. 19(2). 63–81. 51 indexed citations
20.
Aleklett, K., et al.. (2009). Aviation fuel and future oil production scenarios. Energy Policy. 37(10). 4003–4010. 107 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026