Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman

1.1k total citations
23 papers, 840 citations indexed

About

Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Mechanical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 840 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Water Science and Technology, 11 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 11 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman's work include Membrane Separation Technologies (12 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (9 papers) and Fuel Cells and Related Materials (6 papers). Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman is often cited by papers focused on Membrane Separation Technologies (12 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (9 papers) and Fuel Cells and Related Materials (6 papers). Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and France. Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman's co-authors include Nieck E. Benes, Louis Winnubst, Arian Nijmeijer, Patrick de Wit, Recep Kaş, Alexander Milbrat, Guido Mul, Khalid Khazzal Hummadi, Marc T. M. Koper and Ruud Kortlever and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Water Research and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

In The Last Decade

Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman

21 papers receiving 834 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman Netherlands 15 353 265 257 240 239 23 840
Hang Qin China 17 192 0.5× 348 1.3× 147 0.6× 212 0.9× 162 0.7× 52 731
Ho-In Lee South Korea 12 275 0.8× 418 1.6× 119 0.5× 262 1.1× 175 0.7× 15 816
Hamidreza Mahdavi Iran 18 95 0.3× 228 0.9× 280 1.1× 357 1.5× 147 0.6× 36 783
Pei Nian China 18 136 0.4× 431 1.6× 267 1.0× 324 1.4× 224 0.9× 34 861
Oana David Spain 16 178 0.5× 281 1.1× 410 1.6× 470 2.0× 487 2.0× 25 1.1k
Saisai Li China 20 443 1.3× 524 2.0× 202 0.8× 214 0.9× 376 1.6× 53 1.2k
Qingnan Meng China 17 258 0.7× 323 1.2× 83 0.3× 58 0.2× 159 0.7× 43 675
Wentao Ye China 12 421 1.2× 357 1.3× 101 0.4× 328 1.4× 259 1.1× 22 923
Akram Tavakoli Iran 15 145 0.4× 374 1.4× 79 0.3× 220 0.9× 113 0.5× 39 783
Ayesha Ilyas Belgium 16 114 0.3× 188 0.7× 434 1.7× 420 1.8× 246 1.0× 23 890

Countries citing papers authored by Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman. The network helps show where Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman. Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
3.
Nijmeijer, Arian, et al.. (2024). Increasing hydrophobicity of ceramic membranes by post-deposition nitrogen annealing of molecular layer deposition grown hybrid layers. Applied Surface Science. 683. 161790–161790. 1 indexed citations
6.
Chen, Mingliang, et al.. (2023). Atmospheric-pressure atomic layer deposition: recent applications and new emerging applications in high-porosity/3D materials. Dalton Transactions. 52(30). 10254–10277. 17 indexed citations
7.
Magnacca, Giuliana, et al.. (2023). From ultra to nanofiltration: A review on the fabrication of ZrO2 membranes. Ceramics International. 49(6). 8683–8708. 30 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Mingliang, S.G.J. Heijman, Mieke W.J. Luiten-Olieman, & L.C. Rietveld. (2022). Oil-in-water emulsion separation: Fouling of alumina membranes with and without a silicon carbide deposition in constant flux filtration mode. Water Research. 216. 118267–118267. 48 indexed citations
9.
Nijmeijer, Arian, et al.. (2020). Hydrolytic stability of PEG-grafted γ-alumina membranes: Alkoxysilane vs phosphonic acid linking groups. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 307. 110516–110516. 14 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Mingliang, Ran Shang, Paolo Sberna, et al.. (2020). Highly permeable silicon carbide-alumina ultrafiltration membranes for oil-in-water filtration produced with low-pressure chemical vapor deposition. Separation and Purification Technology. 253. 117496–117496. 51 indexed citations
11.
Huiskes, Cindy, Enrico G. Keim, Henk van Veen, et al.. (2019). New Generation of Mesoporous Silica Membranes Prepared by a Stöber-Solution Pore-Growth Approach. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 11(20). 18528–18539. 21 indexed citations
12.
Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W.J., et al.. (2017). Hydrothermal stability of silica, hybrid silica and Zr-doped hybrid silica membranes. Separation and Purification Technology. 189. 48–53. 48 indexed citations
13.
Huiskes, Cindy, et al.. (2017). Sol-gel processed magnesium-doped silica membranes with improved H2/CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science. 543. 195–201. 43 indexed citations
14.
Kaş, Recep, Khalid Khazzal Hummadi, Ruud Kortlever, et al.. (2016). Three-dimensional porous hollow fibre copper electrodes for efficient and high-rate electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nature Communications. 7(1). 10748–10748. 331 indexed citations
15.
Wit, Patrick de, et al.. (2014). Synthesis of Porous Inorganic Hollow Fibers without Harmful Solvents. ChemSusChem. 8(2). 251–254. 5 indexed citations
16.
Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W.J., Michiel J.T. Raaijmakers, Louis Winnubst, et al.. (2012). Towards a generic method for inorganic porous hollow fibers preparation with shrinkage-controlled small radial dimensions, applied to Al2O3, Ni, SiC, stainless steel, and YSZ. Journal of Membrane Science. 407-408. 155–163. 32 indexed citations
17.
Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W.J., et al.. (2012). New Membranes for Organic Solvent Nanofiltration. Procedia Engineering. 44. 247–250. 2 indexed citations
18.
Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W.J., Louis Winnubst, Arian Nijmeijer, Matthias Weßling, & Nieck E. Benes. (2011). Porous stainless steel hollow fiber membranes via dry–wet spinning. Journal of Membrane Science. 370(1-2). 124–130. 64 indexed citations
19.
Zwijnenberg, H.J., Marcel Boerrigter, Mark A. Hempenius, et al.. (2011). Important factors influencing molecular weight cut-off determination of membranes in organic solvents. Journal of Membrane Science. 390-391. 211–217. 33 indexed citations
20.
Luiten-Olieman, Mieke W.J., H.J. Zwijnenberg, Lydia A.M. Bolhuis‐Versteeg, et al.. (2011). Composite capillary membrane for solvent resistant nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science. 372(1-2). 182–190. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026