Michelle Bentham

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Michelle Bentham is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Bentham has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Environmental Engineering, 8 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 7 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Michelle Bentham's work include CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (16 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (7 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (7 papers). Michelle Bentham is often cited by papers focused on CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (16 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (7 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (7 papers). Michelle Bentham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and Netherlands. Michelle Bentham's co-authors include Niklas Heinemann, Cornelia Schmidt‐Hattenberger, Katriona Edlmann, Aliakbar Hassanpouryouzband, Johannes Miocic, Juan Alcalde, Alexander Rudloff, Jens Kallmeyer, Gion Strobel and R. Carbonell and has published in prestigious journals such as Energy & Environmental Science, Nature Energy and International journal of greenhouse gas control.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Bentham

18 papers receiving 957 citations

Hit Papers

Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media – t... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Bentham United Kingdom 11 606 372 366 270 259 19 1.0k
Gion Strobel Germany 7 669 1.1× 533 1.4× 366 1.0× 334 1.2× 268 1.0× 14 1.1k
Eike Marie Thaysen United Kingdom 13 1.0k 1.7× 804 2.2× 617 1.7× 530 2.0× 437 1.7× 23 1.7k
Mirhasan Hosseini Australia 19 809 1.3× 517 1.4× 550 1.5× 477 1.8× 432 1.7× 23 1.1k
Jérôme Corvisier France 15 844 1.4× 261 0.7× 269 0.7× 203 0.8× 204 0.8× 22 1.3k
Tore A. Torp Norway 8 666 1.1× 222 0.6× 570 1.6× 137 0.5× 227 0.9× 13 1.1k
Ausama Giwelli Australia 20 619 1.0× 309 0.8× 490 1.3× 512 1.9× 447 1.7× 58 1.1k
Pierre Chiquet France 17 1.2k 1.9× 411 1.1× 519 1.4× 462 1.7× 647 2.5× 40 1.5k
Sarah E. Gasda Norway 21 1.4k 2.4× 353 0.9× 850 2.3× 245 0.9× 1.0k 3.9× 69 1.9k
Ying Teng China 15 330 0.5× 283 0.8× 159 0.4× 255 0.9× 195 0.8× 50 631
Hejuan Liu China 19 499 0.8× 139 0.4× 441 1.2× 369 1.4× 371 1.4× 60 991

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Bentham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Bentham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Bentham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Bentham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Bentham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Bentham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Bentham. The network helps show where Michelle Bentham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Bentham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Bentham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Bentham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Bentham. Michelle Bentham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Heinemann, Niklas, Juan Alcalde, Johannes Miocic, et al.. (2021). Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media – the scientific challenges. Energy & Environmental Science. 14(2). 853–864. 698 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Akhurst, Maxine, Karen Kirk, Filip Neele, et al.. (2021). Storage Readiness Levels: communicating the maturity of site technical understanding, permitting and planning needed for storage operations using CO2. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 110. 103402–103402. 15 indexed citations
3.
Akhurst, Maxine, Karen Kirk, Filip Neele, et al.. (2021). Communicating site technical, permitting and planning readiness for CO2 storage operations using the ALIGN-CCUS framework of Storage Readiness Levels. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bentham, Michelle. (2019). A porous medium for all seasons. Nature Energy. 4(2). 97–98. 5 indexed citations
5.
Akhurst, Maxine, Michelle Bentham, Karen Kirk, Filip Neele, & Alv-Arne Grimstad. (2019). Steps to Achieve Storage Readiness for European Industrial CO2 Source Clusters, for Application to European Storage Sites, ALIGN-CCUS Project. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gamboa, Davide, John Williams, Michelle Bentham, David I. Schofield, & Andrew C. Mitchell. (2019). Application of three-dimensional fault stress models for assessment of fault stability for CO2 storage sites. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 90. 102820–102820. 11 indexed citations
7.
Markusson, Nils, et al.. (2018). The pore space scramble; challenges and opportunities for subsurface governance. Geoforum. 95. 70–77. 10 indexed citations
8.
Bentham, Michelle, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of Barriers to National CO2 Geological Storage Assessments. Energy Procedia. 114. 4750–4756. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bentham, Michelle, et al.. (2017). Using Pressure Recovery at a Depleted Gas Field to Understand Saline Aquifer Connectivity. Energy Procedia. 114. 2906–2920. 17 indexed citations
10.
Bentham, Michelle, et al.. (2014). Managing CO2 Storage Resources in a Mature CCS Future. Energy Procedia. 63. 5310–5324. 6 indexed citations
11.
Bentham, Michelle, et al.. (2014). CO2 STORage Evaluation Database (CO2 Stored). The UK's online storage atlas. Energy Procedia. 63. 5103–5113. 75 indexed citations
13.
Gough, Clair, Michelle Bentham, Simon Shackley, & Sam Holloway. (2009). Carbon dioxide capture and storage scenarios: a case study of the East Midlands and Yorkshire (UK). International Journal of Global Energy Issues. 31(3/4). 272–272. 3 indexed citations
14.
Bentham, Michelle, Richard Vernon, Karen Kirk, et al.. (2009). Assessment of the potential for geological storage of carbon dioxide in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Energy Procedia. 1(1). 2655–2662. 21 indexed citations
15.
Wildenborg, Ton, Michelle Bentham, Andy Chadwick, et al.. (2009). Large-scale CO2 injection demos for the development of monitoring and verification technology and guidelines (CO2 ReMoVe). Energy Procedia. 1(1). 2367–2374. 20 indexed citations
16.
Bentham, Michelle. (2007). CO2ReMoVe update : research into monitoring and verification of CO2 storage sites. 1 indexed citations
17.
Holloway, Sam, et al.. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up estimates of CO2 storage capacity in the United Kingdom sector of the southern North Sea basin. Environmental Geosciences. 13(2). 71–84. 53 indexed citations
18.
Falus, György, Georgi Georgiev, Bruno Saftić, et al.. (2006). Integration of CO2 Emission and Geological Storage Data from Eastern Europe – CASTOR WP 1.2. 329. 2 indexed citations
19.
West, Julia M., Jonathan Pearce, Michelle Bentham, & P.R. Maul. (2005). Issue profile: environmental issues and the geological storage of CO2. European Environment. 15(4). 250–259. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026