Michèle Ampe

969 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 663 citations indexed

About

Michèle Ampe is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michèle Ampe has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 663 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Genetics, 4 papers in Cancer Research and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Michèle Ampe's work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). Michèle Ampe is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). Michèle Ampe collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, France and United States. Michèle Ampe's co-authors include Geert Verbeke, Joris Vermeesch, Evelyne Vanneste, Peter Könings, Thierry Voet, Yves Moreau, Thomas D’Hooghe, Jean‐Pierre Fryns, Cindy Melotte and Cédric Le Caignec and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, Nature Protocols and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

In The Last Decade

Michèle Ampe

7 papers receiving 636 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos

2009 601 citations Evelyne Vanneste, Thierry Voet et al. Nature Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michèle Ampe Belgium	4	336	286	278	173	93	7	663
Masoud Zamani Esteki Netherlands	13	350 1.0×	286 1.0×	290 1.0×	185 1.1×	103 1.1×	34	727
Koen Theunis Belgium	7	286 0.9×	358 1.3×	167 0.6×	141 0.8×	61 0.7×	10	662
Jingly F. Weier United States	12	259 0.8×	312 1.1×	191 0.7×	63 0.4×	90 1.0×	36	675
Aaron Bogutz Canada	14	180 0.5×	566 2.0×	223 0.8×	51 0.3×	85 0.9×	18	681
D E Rooney United Kingdom	10	243 0.7×	245 0.9×	291 1.0×	72 0.4×	86 0.9×	14	631
Evelyne Vanneste Belgium	13	759 2.3×	532 1.9×	555 2.0×	348 2.0×	169 1.8×	20	1.3k
Yuka Kabayama Germany	6	244 0.7×	604 2.1×	87 0.3×	103 0.6×	152 1.6×	6	884
Hiroki Umehara Japan	12	251 0.7×	1000 3.5×	415 1.5×	203 1.2×	27 0.3×	17	1.2k
Yvonne K. Kwok China	13	300 0.9×	216 0.8×	285 1.0×	36 0.2×	51 0.5×	25	563
Vincent Gâtinois France	11	206 0.6×	269 0.9×	279 1.0×	51 0.3×	94 1.0×	28	600

Countries citing papers authored by Michèle Ampe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michèle Ampe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michèle Ampe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michèle Ampe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michèle Ampe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michèle Ampe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michèle Ampe. The network helps show where Michèle Ampe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michèle Ampe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michèle Ampe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michèle Ampe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michèle Ampe. Michèle Ampe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Ampe, Michèle, et al.. (2016). Peritoneal limited conditioning reduces postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial in robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. Gynecological Surgery. 13(3). 139–146. 3 indexed citations

2.

Jeandarme, Inge, Ciska Wittouck, Freya Vander Laenen, et al.. (2015). Forensische pilootprojecten ‘medium security|. 36(3). 227–247. 3 indexed citations

3.

Könings, Peter, Evelyne Vanneste, Michèle Ampe, et al.. (2012). Microarray analysis of copy number variation in single cells. Nature Protocols. 7(2). 281–310. 23 indexed citations

4.

Vanneste, Evelyne, Thierry Voet, Michèle Ampe, et al.. (2012). Chromosome Instability Is Common in Human Cleavage-Stage Embryos. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 67(12). 787–788. 1 indexed citations

5.

Dewaele, Barbara, Francesca Maggiani, Giuseppe Floris, et al.. (2011). Frequent activation of EGFR in advanced chordomas. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1(1). 30 indexed citations

6.

Ampe, Michèle, Geert Verbeke, Evelyne Vanneste, & Joris Vermeesch. (2010). Analysis of array CGH data for the detection of single-cell chromosomal imbalances. 11(2). 224–244. 2 indexed citations

7.

Vanneste, Evelyne, Thierry Voet, Cédric Le Caignec, et al.. (2009). Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nature Medicine. 15(5). 577–583. 601 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact