Michel Blot
Impact in
- Genetics top 5%
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Endocrinology top 5%
Papers in
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 7
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 6
- Genetics 17
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 11
- Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 8
- Co-authors
- Dominique Schneider (5 shared papers)Richard E. Lenski (4 shared papers)Werner Arber (7 shared papers)Thierry Naas (3 shared papers)Vaughn S. Cooper (1 shared paper)W M Fitch (2 shared papers)Evelyne Coursange (4 shared papers)Esther Duperchy (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Genetics (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Molecular Microbiology (2 papers)Polar Biology (2 papers)Journal of Bacteriology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michel Blot
29 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Genetics 640
- Endocrinology 96
- Molecular Medicine 73
- Ecology 302
- Molecular Biology 711
Countries citing papers authored by Michel Blot
This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Blot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Blot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Blot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Blot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Blot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Blot. The network helps show where Michel Blot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michel Blot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 204 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 180 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 115 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 111 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 82 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 75 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 67 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 58 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 50 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 34 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 27 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 26 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 11 |
About Michel Blot
Michel Blot is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Plant Science and Molecular Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (11 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (640 citations), Endocrinology (96 citations), Molecular Medicine (73 citations), Ecology (302 citations) and Molecular Biology (711 citations). Michel Blot has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dominique Schneider, Richard E. Lenski, Werner Arber, Thierry Naas, Vaughn S. Cooper, W M Fitch, Evelyne Coursange, Esther Duperchy, Dimitri Papadopoulos and Erik R. Zinser. Their work appears in journals such as Genetics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular Microbiology, Polar Biology and Journal of Bacteriology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.