Michael Wehr
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 6
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 6
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function 30
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 13
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 14
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 8
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 7
- Developmental Biology top 2%
- Neurology top 5%
-
- Advanced Memory and Neural Computing 5
- Co-authors
- Anthony M. ZadorGilles LaurentIryna YavorskaAlexandra K. MooreMichael R. DeWeeseBenjamin SchollChristian K. MachensXiang Gao
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Wehr
42 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Sensory Systems 936
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.1k
- Developmental Biology 168
- Neurology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wehr
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wehr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wehr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wehr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wehr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wehr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wehr. The network helps show where Michael Wehr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Wehr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 71 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 161 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 104 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 73 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 320 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 219 | |
| 20 | Spectro-Temporal Receptive Fields of Subthreshold Responses in Auditory Cortex | 2002 | 12 |
About Michael Wehr
Michael Wehr is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (30 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (13 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (8 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers) and Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (936 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.0k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.1k citations). Michael Wehr has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony M. Zador, Gilles Laurent, Iryna Yavorska, Alexandra K. Moore, Michael R. DeWeese, Benjamin Scholl, Christian K. Machens, Xiang Gao, Aldis P. Weible and Cristopher M. Niell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, Neuron, Frontiers in Neural Circuits and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.