Michael W. King

1.8k total citations
40 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Michael W. King is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Civil and Structural Engineering and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael W. King has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 4 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Michael W. King's work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (5 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers). Michael W. King is often cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (5 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers). Michael W. King collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. Michael W. King's co-authors include Anton W. Neff, Anthony L. Mescher, Robert N. Eisenman, Stephan Hann, Carl W. Anderson, David L. Bentley, Mark W. Harty, James M. Roberts, Matthew W. Grow and Rosamund C. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Nucleic Acids Research and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Michael W. King

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael W. King United States 17 1.0k 169 161 143 131 40 1.5k
Marie‐Lise Couble France 27 995 1.0× 190 1.1× 117 0.7× 137 1.0× 149 1.1× 54 2.2k
Charli Kruse Germany 23 766 0.7× 104 0.6× 233 1.4× 192 1.3× 303 2.3× 70 1.7k
Lise Clark United States 17 547 0.5× 110 0.7× 123 0.8× 95 0.7× 305 2.3× 25 1.3k
Jeanne Wilson‐Rawls United States 23 1.0k 1.0× 318 1.9× 134 0.8× 159 1.1× 161 1.2× 47 1.6k
Masanobu Obara Japan 19 871 0.8× 233 1.4× 116 0.7× 358 2.5× 92 0.7× 35 1.6k
Phillip B. Gates United Kingdom 20 1.4k 1.3× 247 1.5× 77 0.5× 247 1.7× 208 1.6× 27 1.6k
Jessica A. Lehoczky United States 16 548 0.5× 203 1.2× 82 0.5× 96 0.7× 119 0.9× 33 903
Martin N. Nakatsu United States 18 1.4k 1.3× 164 1.0× 229 1.4× 347 2.4× 360 2.7× 23 2.6k
Sólveig Þorsteinsdóttir Portugal 24 918 0.9× 195 1.2× 86 0.5× 372 2.6× 226 1.7× 47 1.4k
Alana Auden Australia 15 1.0k 1.0× 255 1.5× 114 0.7× 261 1.8× 105 0.8× 24 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. King. The network helps show where Michael W. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. King. Michael W. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Michael W., et al.. (2023). Regulation of gene expression downstream of a novel Fgf/Erk pathway during Xenopus development. PLoS ONE. 18(10). e0286040–e0286040. 1 indexed citations
2.
King, Michael W.. (2017). Health Care Efficiencies. American Journal of Law & Medicine. 43(4). 426–467. 4 indexed citations
3.
Mescher, Anthony L., Anton W. Neff, & Michael W. King. (2016). Inflammation and immunity in organ regeneration. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 66. 98–110. 114 indexed citations
4.
King, Michael W., Anton W. Neff, & Anthony L. Mescher. (2012). The Developing Xenopus Limb as a Model for Studies on the Balance between Inflammation and Regeneration. The Anatomical Record. 295(10). 1552–1561. 71 indexed citations
5.
Neff, Anton W., Michael W. King, & Anthony L. Mescher. (2011). Dedifferentiation and the role of sall4 in reprogramming and patterning during amphibian limb regeneration. Developmental Dynamics. 240(5). 979–989. 46 indexed citations
6.
King, Michael W., Anton W. Neff, & Anthony L. Mescher. (2009). Proteomics analysis of regenerating amphibian limbs: changes during the onset of regeneration. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 53(7). 955–969. 36 indexed citations
8.
Werner, Sean R., Anthony L. Mescher, Anton W. Neff, et al.. (2007). Neural MMP‐28 expression precedes myelination during development and peripheral nerve repair. Developmental Dynamics. 236(10). 2852–2864. 32 indexed citations
9.
King, Michael W., Matthew W. Grow, Anton W. Neff, & Anthony L. Mescher. (2006). Genechip analysis of Xenopus hindlimb regeneration: Comparisons of complete and incomplete stage-dependent regeneration. Developmental Biology. 295(1). 355–355. 1 indexed citations
10.
Grow, Matthew W., Anton W. Neff, Anthony L. Mescher, & Michael W. King. (2006). Global analysis of gene expression in Xenopus hindlimbs during stage‐dependent complete and incomplete regeneration. Developmental Dynamics. 235(10). 2667–2685. 48 indexed citations
11.
Neff, Anton W., Michael W. King, Mark W. Harty, et al.. (2005). Expression of Xenopus XlSALL4 during limb development and regeneration. Developmental Dynamics. 233(2). 356–367. 37 indexed citations
12.
Harty, Mark W., Anton W. Neff, Michael W. King, & Anthony L. Mescher. (2003). Regeneration or scarring: An immunologic perspective. Developmental Dynamics. 226(2). 268–279. 196 indexed citations
13.
King, Michael W.. (2003). Rapid and Nonradioactive Screening of Recombinant Libraries by PCR. Humana Press eBooks. 192. 377–384.
14.
King, Michael W., John Calley, Mark W. Harty, et al.. (2003). Identification of genes expressed during Xenopus laevis limb regeneration by using subtractive hybridization. Developmental Dynamics. 226(2). 398–409. 39 indexed citations
15.
King, Michael W., et al.. (2001). Human truncated Smad 6 (Smad 6s) inhibits the BMP pathway in Xenopus laevis. Development Growth & Differentiation. 43(2). 115–132. 8 indexed citations
16.
Stuart, Gary W., Zhu Zhu, Karuna Sampath, & Michael W. King. (1995). POU-domain sequences from the flatworm Dugesia tigrina. Gene. 161(2). 299–300. 5 indexed citations
17.
King, Michael W. & Ayaho Miyamoto. (1994). Integrated impact failure analysis of concrete slab structures with consideration of impact load characteristics. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 150(2-3). 295–301. 3 indexed citations
19.
King, Michael W., et al.. (1991). 2177 MODELING OF IMPACT LOAD CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION TO ANALYSIS OF RC SLAB STRUCTURES. 13(2). 1039–1044. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hann, Stephan, Michael W. King, David L. Bentley, Carl W. Anderson, & Robert N. Eisenman. (1988). A non-AUG translational initiation in c-myc exon 1 generates an N-terminally distinct protein whose synthesis is disrupted in Burkitt's lymphomas. Cell. 52(2). 185–195. 415 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026