Michael Tuck

577 total citations
7 papers, 258 citations indexed

About

Michael Tuck is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Biophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Tuck has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 258 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Spectroscopy and 3 papers in Biophysics. Recurrent topics in Michael Tuck's work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers). Michael Tuck is often cited by papers focused on Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers). Michael Tuck collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Michael Tuck's co-authors include Nathan Heath Patterson, Richard M. Caprioli, Raf Van de Plas, Landry Blanc, Nicolas Desbenoît, Alexis Kaushansky, Jeremy L. Norris, Adam Lewis, Andreas Römpp and Jean‐Christophe Taveau and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Michael Tuck

7 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Tuck United States	6	173	159	57	33	21	7	258
Erika R. Amstalden Netherlands	6	232 1.3×	187 1.2×	25 0.4×	79 2.4×	55 2.6×	6	333
Marcel Niehaus Germany	7	374 2.2×	283 1.8×	26 0.5×	91 2.8×	28 1.3×	9	471
Werner Bouschen Germany	5	231 1.3×	194 1.2×	12 0.2×	91 2.8×	31 1.5×	7	344
Pere Ràfols Spain	12	288 1.7×	255 1.6×	36 0.6×	65 2.0×	53 2.5×	20	431
Jean‐Luc Vorng United Kingdom	8	107 0.6×	104 0.7×	32 0.6×	60 1.8×	33 1.6×	16	207
Vincen Wu United Kingdom	6	124 0.7×	107 0.7×	28 0.5×	30 0.9×	21 1.0×	7	197
Manxi Yang United States	11	288 1.7×	180 1.1×	29 0.5×	51 1.5×	26 1.2×	22	336
Chelsea J. Nikula United Kingdom	6	86 0.5×	77 0.5×	19 0.3×	19 0.6×	17 0.8×	9	146
Xie‐Xuan Zhou Denmark	4	276 1.6×	311 2.0×	19 0.3×	4 0.1×	10 0.5×	6	380
Jake Rosenberg United States	9	266 1.5×	190 1.2×	5 0.1×	61 1.8×	14 0.7×	13	343

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tuck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tuck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tuck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tuck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tuck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tuck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tuck. The network helps show where Michael Tuck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Tuck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Tuck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Tuck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Tuck. Michael Tuck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Gunawardana, Manjula, Simon G. Webster, Paul Webster, et al.. (2022). Fundamental aspects of long-acting tenofovir alafenamide delivery from subdermal implants for HIV prophylaxis. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 8224–8224. 11 indexed citations

2.

Tuck, Michael, et al.. (2022). MALDI-MSI Towards Multimodal Imaging: Challenges and Perspectives. Frontiers in Chemistry. 10. 904688–904688. 53 indexed citations

3.

Blanc, Landry, Gino B. Ferraro, Michael Tuck, et al.. (2021). Kendrick Mass Defect Variation to Decipher Isotopic Labeling in Brain Metastases Studied by Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Analytical Chemistry. 93(49). 16314–16319. 5 indexed citations

4.

Tuck, Michael, Landry Blanc, Nathan Heath Patterson, et al.. (2020). Multimodal Imaging Based on Vibrational Spectroscopies and Mass Spectrometry Imaging Applied to Biological Tissue: A Multiscale and Multiomics Review. Analytical Chemistry. 93(1). 445–477. 58 indexed citations

5.

Patterson, Nathan Heath, Michael Tuck, Adam Lewis, et al.. (2018). Next Generation Histology-Directed Imaging Mass Spectrometry Driven by Autofluorescence Microscopy. Analytical Chemistry. 90(21). 12404–12413. 49 indexed citations

6.

Reyzer, Michelle L., Jeremy L. Barth, W. Hayes McDonald, et al.. (2018). Use of Proteomic Imaging Coupled With Transcriptomic Analysis to Identify Biomolecules Responsive to Cochlear Injury. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 11. 243–243. 2 indexed citations

7.

Patterson, Nathan Heath, Michael Tuck, Raf Van de Plas, & Richard M. Caprioli. (2018). Advanced Registration and Analysis of MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry Measurements through Autofluorescence Microscopy. Analytical Chemistry. 90(21). 12395–12403. 80 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact