Countries citing papers authored by Michael Sullivan
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Sullivan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Sullivan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Sullivan. The network helps show where Michael Sullivan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Sullivan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Sullivan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Sullivan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Sullivan. Michael Sullivan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Corbeil, R. R., et al.. (2007). Enhancing E-learning through M-learning: Are You Ready to Go Mobile?. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2007(1). 273–280.1 indexed citations
4.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (2007). Increasing Social Interaction in Online Classes Through Live E-learning. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2007(1). 189–194.1 indexed citations
5.
Washington, Gregory, et al.. (2006). TANF Policy. Journal of Health & Social Policy. 21(3). 1–16.3 indexed citations
6.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (2005). Promoting Synchronous Interaction in an eLearning Environment: Cyber-Instructors Continually Seek Instructional Tools That Will Hold Students' Attention, and Make Online Communications More Efficient and Effective. Skype Is the Latest One to Test. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 33(2). 27.3 indexed citations
7.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (2005). Promoting Synchronous Interaction in an eLearning Environment. THE journal. 33(2). 27–30.27 indexed citations
8.
Corbeil, R. R., et al.. (2005). e-Portfolios as High-Stakes Assessment in a Graduate Distance Education Program. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2005(1). 47–52.1 indexed citations
9.
Hunter, John M., et al.. (2004). Applications of networking capabilities to assist in situational awareness. 25–32.2 indexed citations
10.
Molenda, Michael & Michael Sullivan. (2001). Technology in Education: The Boom Is Behind Us.. 10(3). 14–19.1 indexed citations
Sullivan, Michael. (1992). The politics of social policy.7 indexed citations
15.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (1990). The Meeting of Eastern and Western Art. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 110(4). 747–747.5 indexed citations
16.
Reynolds, David, Michael Sullivan, & Stephen Murgatroyd. (1987). The comprehensive experiment : a comparison of the selective and non-selective systems of school organization.8 indexed citations
17.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (1980). Symbols of Eternity.. Pacific Affairs. 53(2). 329–329.
18.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (1974). The Arts of China.. Pacific Affairs. 47(2). 227–227.1 indexed citations
19.
Sullivan, Michael, et al.. (1971). Topics in elementary mathematics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.