Michael Stanton

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Michael Stanton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Education and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Stanton has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 10 papers in Education and 6 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Michael Stanton's work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Michael Stanton is often cited by papers focused on Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (3 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (3 papers). Michael Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Cameroon. Michael Stanton's co-authors include Charles R. Jonassaint, Redford B. Williams, Michael Pluess, Jay Belsky, Beverly H. Brummett, Howard J. Shaffer, Debi A. LaPlante, Richard A. LaBrie, Rachel Kidman and Sarah E. Nelson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Public Health and Molecular Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Michael Stanton

35 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Stanton United States 13 847 278 231 225 178 39 1.6k
René Carbonneau Canada 21 1.2k 1.4× 289 1.0× 226 1.0× 287 1.3× 290 1.6× 42 1.8k
Geoffrey H. Cohane United States 8 976 1.2× 169 0.6× 195 0.8× 207 0.9× 212 1.2× 8 2.0k
Generós Ortet Spain 25 966 1.1× 342 1.2× 351 1.5× 360 1.6× 193 1.1× 93 2.0k
Cecilia Åslund Sweden 27 710 0.8× 351 1.3× 448 1.9× 219 1.0× 195 1.1× 63 1.7k
Britt af Klinteberg Sweden 25 1.0k 1.2× 216 0.8× 354 1.5× 133 0.6× 227 1.3× 80 1.6k
Diana Fishbein United States 29 1.1k 1.3× 300 1.1× 341 1.5× 289 1.3× 273 1.5× 111 2.4k
Roman Koposov Norway 22 943 1.1× 310 1.1× 225 1.0× 121 0.5× 193 1.1× 85 1.7k
Manuel I. Ibáñez Spain 25 899 1.1× 290 1.0× 275 1.2× 361 1.6× 277 1.6× 84 1.9k
Rhiannon Newcombe New Zealand 14 826 1.0× 567 2.0× 275 1.2× 193 0.9× 108 0.6× 31 1.9k
Paulo Dalgalarrondo Brazil 23 946 1.1× 245 0.9× 241 1.0× 99 0.4× 340 1.9× 107 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stanton. The network helps show where Michael Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Stanton. Michael Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baumer, Yvonne, Laurel Mendelsohn, Joshua A. Jacobs, et al.. (2025). Loneliness associates with endothelial dysfunction in a community-based cohort: a pilot study and translational approach. PubMed. 2(1). 28–28. 1 indexed citations
2.
Stanton, Michael, et al.. (2022). Relationship among interpersonal stressors in adolescence, social support buffers, and obesity in adulthood 14 years later.. Health Psychology. 41(12). 904–911. 3 indexed citations
3.
Bayley, Peter J., R. Jay Schulz‐Heik, Danielle C. Mathersul, et al.. (2020). Yoga is effective in treating symptoms of Gulf War illness: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 143. 563–571. 12 indexed citations
4.
Oppezzo, Marily, et al.. (2018). To Text or Not to Text: Electronic Message Intervention to Improve Treatment Adherence Versus Matched Historical Controls. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 7(4). e11720–e11720. 4 indexed citations
5.
Schulz‐Heik, R. Jay, et al.. (2017). Results from a clinical yoga program for veterans: yoga via telehealth provides comparable satisfaction and health improvements to in-person yoga. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 17(1). 198–198. 60 indexed citations
6.
Stanton, Michael, et al.. (2016). Mindfulness as a Weight Loss Treatment for Veterans. Frontiers in Nutrition. 3. 30–30. 5 indexed citations
7.
Stanton, Michael, et al.. (2016). Social Norms Shift Preferences for Healthy and Unhealthy Foods. PLoS ONE. 11(11). e0166286–e0166286. 21 indexed citations
8.
Stanton, Michael, Jennifer L. Robinson, Susan M. Kirkpatrick, et al.. (2016). DIETFITS study (diet intervention examining the factors interacting with treatment success) – Study design and methods. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 53. 151–161. 39 indexed citations
9.
Stanton, Michael, Charles R. Jonassaint, Christopher L. Edwards, et al.. (2010). The Association of Optimism and Perceived Discrimination With Health Care Utilization in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease. Journal of the National Medical Association. 102(11). 1056–1064. 22 indexed citations
10.
Jonassaint, Charles R., Jude Jonassaint, Michael Stanton, Laura M. De Castro, & Charmaine Royal. (2010). Clinical and Sociodemographic Factors Predict Coping Styles Among Adults With Sickle Cell Disease. Journal of the National Medical Association. 102(11). 1045–1049. 7 indexed citations
11.
Stanton, Michael, Charles R. Jonassaint, Redford B. Williams, & Sherman A. James. (2010). Socioeconomic Status Moderates the Association Between John Henryism and NEO PI-R Personality Domains. Psychosomatic Medicine. 72(2). 141–147. 17 indexed citations
12.
Belsky, Jay, Charles R. Jonassaint, Michael Pluess, et al.. (2009). Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes?. Molecular Psychiatry. 14(8). 746–754. 720 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Shaffer, Howard J., Michael Stanton, & Sarah E. Nelson. (2006). Trends in Gambling Studies Research: Quantifying, Categorizing, and Describing Citations. Journal of Gambling Studies. 22(4). 427–442. 36 indexed citations
14.
Shaffer, Howard J., et al.. (2004). Toward a Syndrome Model of Addiction: Multiple Expressions, Common Etiology. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 12(6). 367–374. 425 indexed citations
15.
Stanton, Michael. (1992). Internships: Learning by Doing.. 36(2). 30–33. 16 indexed citations
16.
Stanton, Michael. (1989). Reporting What We Think: The Pollsters.. 33(1). 12–19. 1 indexed citations
17.
Stanton, Michael. (1988). Cooperative Education: Working towards Your Future.. 32(3). 22–29. 3 indexed citations
18.
Stanton, Michael. (1987). A College Admissions Primer.. 31(2). 2–8.
19.
Stanton, Michael. (1985). The Secret Sentinels: Careers in Intelligence.. 29(3). 2–14. 1 indexed citations
20.
Stanton, Michael. (1980). Moral Judgments among Students: A Cross-Cultural Study.. 15(57). 4386–4386. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026