Michael Spannowsky

6.1k total citations
57 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Michael Spannowsky is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Spannowsky has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 18 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Michael Spannowsky's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (54 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (24 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (21 papers). Michael Spannowsky is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (54 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (24 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (21 papers). Michael Spannowsky collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Switzerland. Michael Spannowsky's co-authors include Christoph Englert, Valentin V. Khoze, Joerg Jaeckel, M. Chala, Manimala Mitra, Shankha Banerjee, Philip Harris, Ciaran Williams, Andreas Papaefstathiou and D. E. Ferreira de Lima and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Journal of High Energy Physics.

In The Last Decade

Michael Spannowsky

57 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Spannowsky United Kingdom 23 1.3k 542 57 44 18 57 1.3k
Duff Neill United States 14 991 0.8× 262 0.5× 26 0.5× 31 0.7× 14 0.8× 23 1.1k
Ken Mimasu United Kingdom 13 936 0.7× 335 0.6× 47 0.8× 31 0.7× 25 1.4× 31 962
Aleksandr Azatov Italy 24 1.3k 1.0× 496 0.9× 36 0.6× 40 0.9× 20 1.1× 37 1.3k
Ian Lewis United States 24 1.1k 0.8× 587 1.1× 43 0.8× 26 0.6× 38 2.1× 44 1.3k
Andrew Fowlie Australia 18 847 0.7× 611 1.1× 62 1.1× 56 1.3× 12 0.7× 43 987
Seungwon Baek South Korea 27 1.7k 1.3× 598 1.1× 47 0.8× 52 1.2× 13 0.7× 80 1.7k
Tyler Corbett United States 15 960 0.7× 225 0.4× 45 0.8× 22 0.5× 37 2.1× 26 969
Giuliano Panico Italy 26 1.9k 1.5× 719 1.3× 79 1.4× 67 1.5× 40 2.2× 43 2.0k
Javier Fuentes-Martín Switzerland 21 1.5k 1.2× 228 0.4× 141 2.5× 26 0.6× 41 2.3× 32 1.5k
Luca Di Luzio Italy 25 1.7k 1.3× 683 1.3× 75 1.3× 119 2.7× 10 0.6× 64 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Spannowsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Spannowsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Spannowsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Spannowsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Spannowsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Spannowsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Spannowsky. The network helps show where Michael Spannowsky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Spannowsky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Spannowsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Spannowsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Spannowsky. Michael Spannowsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Banerjee, Shankha, Rahool Kumar Barman, Brian Batell, et al.. (2024). Prospects for exotic h→4τ decays in single and di-Higgs boson production at the LHC and future hadron colliders. Physical review. D. 109(5). 1 indexed citations
2.
Ingoldby, James, et al.. (2024). Enhancing quantum field theory simulations on NISQ devices with Hamiltonian truncation. Physical review. D. 110(9). 3 indexed citations
3.
Gupta, Rick S., Joerg Jaeckel, & Michael Spannowsky. (2023). Probing Poincaré violation. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2023(11). 3 indexed citations
4.
Banerjee, Shankha, et al.. (2023). Effective limits on single scalar extensions in the light of recent LHC data. Physical review. D. 107(5). 17 indexed citations
5.
Chakrabortty, Joydeep, et al.. (2021). Effective operator bases for beyond Standard Model scenarios: an EFT compendium for discoveries. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 17 indexed citations
6.
Araz, Jack Y., et al.. (2021). Precision SMEFT bounds from the VBF Higgs at high transverse momentum. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 16 indexed citations
7.
Criado, Juan Carlos, Valentin V. Khoze, & Michael Spannowsky. (2021). The emergence of electroweak Skyrmions through Higgs bosons. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 3 indexed citations
8.
Khoze, Valentin V., et al.. (2021). Small instantons and the strong CP problem in composite Higgs models. Physical review. D. 104(7). 11 indexed citations
9.
Khoze, Valentin V., et al.. (2019). Precision measurements for the Higgsploding standard model. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 46(6). 65004–65004. 5 indexed citations
10.
Khoze, Valentin V. & Michael Spannowsky. (2019). Consistency of Higgsplosion in localizable QFT. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 5 indexed citations
11.
Chala, M., José Santiago, & Michael Spannowsky. (2019). Constraining four-fermion operators using rare top decays. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 23 indexed citations
12.
Butterworth, J. M., M. Chala, Christoph Englert, Michael Spannowsky, & Arsenii Titov. (2019). Higgs phenomenology as a probe of sterile neutrinos. Physical review. D. 100(11). 32 indexed citations
13.
Chala, M., Ramona Gröber, & Michael Spannowsky. (2018). Searches for vector-like quarks at future colliders and implications for composite Higgs models with dark matter. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 24 indexed citations
14.
Agrawal, Pankaj, et al.. (2018). Probing the type-II seesaw mechanism through the production of Higgs bosons at a lepton collider. Physical review. D. 98(1). 25 indexed citations
15.
Englert, Christoph, Gabriele Ferretti, & Michael Spannowsky. (2017). Jet-associated resonance spectroscopy. The European Physical Journal C. 77(12). 842–842. 3 indexed citations
16.
Mitra, Manimala, et al.. (2017). Type II seesaw model and multilepton signatures at hadron colliders. Physical review. D. 95(3). 38 indexed citations
17.
Englert, Christoph, Matthew McCullough, & Michael Spannowsky. (2016). S-channel dark matter simplified models and unitarity. Physics of the Dark Universe. 14. 48–56. 45 indexed citations
18.
Jaeckel, Joerg, Valentin V. Khoze, & Michael Spannowsky. (2016). Hearing the signal of dark sectors with gravitational wave detectors. Physical review. D. 94(10). 91 indexed citations
19.
Harris, Philip, Valentin V. Khoze, Michael Spannowsky, & Ciaran Williams. (2015). Constraining dark sectors at colliders: Beyond the effective theory approach. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(5). 77 indexed citations
20.
Buschmann, Malte, Christoph Englert, Dorival Gonçalves, Tilman Plehn, & Michael Spannowsky. (2014). Resolving the Higgs-gluon coupling with jets. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(1). 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Duff Neill Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ken Mimasu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aleksandr Azatov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ian Lewis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Fowlie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Seungwon Baek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tyler Corbett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Giuliano Panico Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Javier Fuentes-Martín Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luca Di Luzio
Rankless by CCL
2026