Michael Scholtes

617 total citations
26 papers, 414 citations indexed

About

Michael Scholtes is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Scholtes has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 414 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Michael Scholtes's work include Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers). Michael Scholtes is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers). Michael Scholtes collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Michael Scholtes's co-authors include G. H. Zeilmaker, J. W. Wladimiroff, Wim C.J. Hop, R.A. Leerentveld, A.Th. Alberda, H. L. Haak, G. Gerretsen, Keywan Sohrabi, Volker Groß and Steffi Pfeiffer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Michael Scholtes

24 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Scholtes Germany 8 273 266 194 78 63 26 414
Jiann‐Loung Hwang Taiwan 13 354 1.3× 350 1.3× 171 0.9× 46 0.6× 27 0.4× 42 491
Ben Kroon Australia 8 336 1.2× 296 1.1× 151 0.8× 66 0.8× 46 0.7× 14 455
Michael Bohrer United States 13 362 1.3× 386 1.5× 225 1.2× 106 1.4× 82 1.3× 19 568
Pedro Melo United Kingdom 11 329 1.2× 219 0.8× 92 0.5× 148 1.9× 127 2.0× 25 440
Jacob Ashkenazi Israel 7 255 0.9× 228 0.9× 136 0.7× 65 0.8× 58 0.9× 8 337
Luca Dal Prato Italy 14 444 1.6× 369 1.4× 167 0.9× 37 0.5× 114 1.8× 22 502
Zdravka Veleva Finland 11 447 1.6× 401 1.5× 412 2.1× 67 0.9× 72 1.1× 17 625
P.E. Egbase United Kingdom 13 283 1.0× 255 1.0× 186 1.0× 68 0.9× 97 1.5× 17 446
R.A. Leerentveld Netherlands 11 337 1.2× 339 1.3× 269 1.4× 81 1.0× 20 0.3× 16 479
Julian S. Pampiglione United Kingdom 8 247 0.9× 190 0.7× 104 0.5× 83 1.1× 56 0.9× 14 338

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Scholtes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Scholtes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Scholtes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Scholtes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Scholtes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Scholtes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Scholtes. The network helps show where Michael Scholtes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Scholtes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Scholtes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Scholtes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Scholtes. Michael Scholtes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bíró, Péter, et al.. (2025). Safety and efficacy of high frequency jet ventilation: A systematic and narrative review. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 106. 111906–111906.
2.
Sohrabi, Keywan, et al.. (2024). Digital health applications in Germany: Explorative pilot study on the challenges of approval from the perspective of manufacturers. Digital Health. 10. 599946388–599946388. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sohrabi, Keywan, et al.. (2023). Roadmap to Approval of a Digital Health Application. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 206–209. 1 indexed citations
4.
Scholtes, Michael, et al.. (2023). Prescribing Behavior and Reasonable Price for Mental Health DiGAs – Results of a Pilot Study. Studies in health technology and informatics. 301. 174–179. 2 indexed citations
5.
Scholtes, Michael, et al.. (2020). Comparison of Formative Evaluation Methods in the Usability Process on the Example of a Medical App. Studies in health technology and informatics. 271. 101–107. 1 indexed citations
6.
Koehler, Ulrich, et al.. (2016). Objektives Monitoring von chronischem Husten mit dem ambulanten Lung-Sound-Monitoring-System LEOSound. Pneumologie. 70(S 01). 1 indexed citations
7.
Sohrabi, Keywan, Michael Scholtes, Olaf Hildebrandt, et al.. (2015). Telemonitoring and Medical Care Supporting of Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases. Studies in health technology and informatics. 212. 141–5. 1 indexed citations
8.
Sohrabi, Keywan, et al.. (2012). Quantification of nasal respiratory flow by tracheal sound analysis. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 57(SI-1 Track-L). 4 indexed citations
9.
Kissler, Stefan, et al.. (2011). Predisposition of subtle endometriotic lesions predominantly on the left side assessed by transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 158(2). 285–288. 9 indexed citations
10.
11.
Scholtes, Michael & G. H. Zeilmaker. (1998). Blastocyst transfer in day-5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not on age. Fertility and Sterility. 69(1). 78–83. 68 indexed citations
12.
Scholtes, Michael & G. H. Zeilmaker. (1996). A prospective, randomized study of embryo transfer results after 3 or 5 days of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility. 65(6). 1245–1248. 117 indexed citations
14.
Leerentveld, R.A., et al.. (1992). Vaginal disinfection with povidon iodine and the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. 7(3). 349–350. 30 indexed citations
15.
Scholtes, Michael, et al.. (1990). Transcervical intrafallopian transfer of zygotes. Fertility and Sterility. 54(2). 283–286. 11 indexed citations
16.
Alberda, A.Th., et al.. (1989). The influence of the interval between in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer and some other variables on treatment outcome. Fertility and Sterility. 51(2). 360–362. 26 indexed citations
17.
Scholtes, Michael, et al.. (1989). Uterine and ovarian flow velocity waveforms in the normal menstrual cycle: a transvaginal Doppler study. Fertility and Sterility. 52(6). 981–985. 97 indexed citations
18.
Scholtes, Michael, et al.. (1988). Factors influencing the outcome of successive IVF treatment cycles in attaining a follicular puncture. Human Reproduction. 3(6). 755–759. 4 indexed citations
19.
Leerentveld, R.A., Michael Scholtes, J. W. Wladimiroff, et al.. (1988). The value and role of plasma 17β-oestradiol measurements during ovarian hyperstimulation for in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. 3(6). 735–739. 4 indexed citations
20.
Scholtes, Michael, G. Gerretsen, & H. L. Haak. (1983). The factor VIII ratio in normal and pathological pregnancies. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 16(2). 89–95. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026