Michael Ruf

3.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
71 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Michael Ruf is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Ruf has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Organic Chemistry, 18 papers in Materials Chemistry and 17 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in Michael Ruf's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (14 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). Michael Ruf is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (14 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). Michael Ruf collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Michael Ruf's co-authors include Heinrich Vahrenkamp, Julio Parra-Martinez, Mao Zeng, K. H. Weis, Zvi Bern, Cortlandt G. Pierpont, Radu Roiban, R. Alsfasser, Mikhail P. Solon and Chia-Hsien Shen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

Michael Ruf

67 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics at... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 2022 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Ruf United States 30 827 730 680 643 561 71 2.7k
A. Das India 34 353 0.4× 236 0.3× 193 0.3× 291 0.5× 224 0.4× 131 3.2k
Minoru Tsutsui United States 30 688 0.8× 1.7k 2.4× 1.2k 1.7× 140 0.2× 290 0.5× 151 3.8k
David Curtin United States 36 738 0.9× 2.0k 2.8× 539 0.8× 1.6k 2.4× 81 0.1× 204 4.9k
Eric G. Hope United Kingdom 31 93 0.1× 2.4k 3.3× 1.3k 2.0× 169 0.3× 281 0.5× 186 3.7k
Frank A. L. Anet United States 38 265 0.3× 2.6k 3.6× 534 0.8× 240 0.4× 169 0.3× 146 5.0k
Masaru Matsuoka Japan 24 635 0.8× 870 1.2× 82 0.1× 258 0.4× 53 0.1× 180 2.9k
Giuliana Gervasio Italy 25 54 0.1× 1.3k 1.7× 877 1.3× 349 0.5× 306 0.5× 133 2.4k
Alexandre N. Sobolev Australia 33 145 0.2× 2.1k 2.9× 1.2k 1.8× 33 0.1× 478 0.9× 257 4.0k
Alfred F. Noels Belgium 42 562 0.7× 3.7k 5.0× 1.1k 1.6× 35 0.1× 247 0.4× 156 4.8k
R. C. Livingston United States 32 2.0k 2.5× 1.9k 2.7× 279 0.4× 143 0.2× 29 0.1× 78 4.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ruf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ruf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ruf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ruf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ruf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ruf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ruf. The network helps show where Michael Ruf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Ruf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Ruf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Ruf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Ruf. Michael Ruf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Herrmann, Enrico, et al.. (2026). Second-Order Self-Force Potential-Region Binary Dynamics at O ( G 5 ) in Supergravity. Physical Review Letters. 136(8). 81401–81401.
2.
Cordero, F. Febres, et al.. (2025). Spinning black hole scattering at $$ \mathcal{O} $$(G3S2): Casimir terms, radial action and hidden symmetry. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2025(3). 10 indexed citations
3.
Schmidt, Alexandre G. M., Michael Ruf, F. Ronning, et al.. (2025). Unusual 5f magnetism in new kagome material UV6Sn6. npj Quantum Materials. 10(1). 66–66. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ruf, Michael, et al.. (2024). Design and synthesis of pillared metal–organic frameworks featuring olefinic fragments. Dalton Transactions. 53(47). 18873–18879. 1 indexed citations
6.
Barack, Leor, Zvi Bern, Enrico Herrmann, et al.. (2023). Comparison of post-Minkowskian and self-force expansions: Scattering in a scalar charge toy model. Physical review. D. 108(2). 30 indexed citations
7.
Cordero, F. Febres, et al.. (2023). Conservative Binary Dynamics with a Spinning Black Hole at O(G3) from Scattering Amplitudes. Physical Review Letters. 130(2). 21601–21601. 64 indexed citations
8.
Bern, Zvi, Julio Parra-Martinez, Radu Roiban, et al.. (2021). Scattering Amplitudes and Conservative Binary Dynamics at O(G4). Physical Review Letters. 126(17). 171601–171601. 163 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Bern, Zvi, Harald Ita, Julio Parra-Martinez, & Michael Ruf. (2020). Universality in the Classical Limit of Massless Gravitational Scattering. Physical Review Letters. 125(3). 31601–31601. 87 indexed citations
10.
Abreu, Samuel, F. Febres Cordero, Harald Ita, et al.. (2020). Two-Loop Four-Graviton Scattering Amplitudes. Physical Review Letters. 124(21). 211601–211601. 26 indexed citations
11.
Sevvana, Madhumati, Michael Ruf, Isabel Usón, George M. Sheldrick, & Regine Herbst‐Irmer. (2019). Non-merohedral twinning: from minerals to proteins. Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology. 75(12). 1040–1050. 40 indexed citations
12.
Chemey, Alexander T., Cristian Celis‐Barros, Kevin Huang, et al.. (2018). Electronic, Magnetic, and Theoretical Characterization of (NH4)4UF8, a Simple Molecular Uranium(IV) Fluoride. Inorganic Chemistry. 58(1). 637–647. 12 indexed citations
13.
Youn, Ui Joung, Eun‐Jung Park, Tamara P. Kondratyuk, et al.. (2016). Withanolides derived from Physalis peruviana (Poha) with potential anti-inflammatory activity. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 26(12). 2755–2759. 43 indexed citations
14.
Ruf, Michael, Carsten Müller, & R. Grobe. (2011). Numerical signatures of non-self-adjointness in quantum Hamiltonians. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 44(34). 345205–345205. 5 indexed citations
15.
Dawson, Angela, David R. Allan, Simon Parsons, & Michael Ruf. (2004). Use of a CCD diffractometer in crystal structure determinations at high pressure. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 37(3). 410–416. 139 indexed citations
17.
Ruf, Michael & Cortlandt G. Pierpont. (1998). Methoxide Coordination at the Pocket of [CuIITpCum,Me] and a Simple Model for the Cu Center of Galactose Oxidase. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 37(12). 1736–1739. 27 indexed citations
18.
Kabir, Shariff E., Michael Ruf, & Heinrich Vahrenkamp. (1998). Insertion of CO and SO2 into the N–N bond of [Fe2(CO)6(μ-Ph2N2)]. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 571(1). 91–96. 6 indexed citations
19.
Ruf, Michael & Heinrich Vahrenkamp. (1996). Hydrolysis of Esters and Amides by the Metallo Nucleophile TpCum,MeZn–OH. Chemische Berichte. 129(9). 1025–1028. 21 indexed citations
20.
Müller, Bodo, Michael Ruf, & Heinrich Vahrenkamp. (1994). On the Nature of Zinc Chloride–Aldehyde Interactions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 33(20). 2089–2090. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026