Michael R. Williams

53 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael R. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Biological Psychiatry 69
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 82
  • Cancer Research 182
  • Genetics 307
  • Oncology 234
Replace Susan L. Connors with:
Susan L. Connors United States
Silvana Sacchetti Brazil
David T. Croke Ireland
Orna Levran United States
Ning Sun China
Christel Péqueux Belgium
Ruoyan Chen United States
Andrea Byrnes United States
Michael W. Nagle United States
Nasim Ahmadiyeh United States
Michael R. Williams relative to Susan L. Connors United States Susan L. Connors's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Susan L. Connors · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael R. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael R. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael R. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael R. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael R. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael R. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael R. Williams. The network helps show where Michael R. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael R. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael R. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Michael R. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984204
2 2015108
3 201699
4 198695
5 198965
6 201651
7 201148
8 200744
9 201640
10 198738
11 200838
12 198534
13 200934
14 195232
15 201231
16 198630
17
The early results from a randomised study of radiotherapy versus Nolvadex (tamoxifen) as initial treatment for stage III breast cancer.
198826
18 201725
19 202025
20 198623

About Michael R. Williams

Michael R. Williams is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (7 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (5 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (4 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (69 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (82 citations), Cancer Research (182 citations), Genetics (307 citations) and Oncology (234 citations). Michael R. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include R.W. Blamey, Robert I. Nicholson, Steven E. Locke, Jane Leserman, Michael R. Hurst, Bryan W. Luikart, Meijie Li, Aslihan O. Turkes, Anthony D. Morielli and Kerry J. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, eLife and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact