Michael Port

968 total citations
34 papers, 682 citations indexed

About

Michael Port is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Ophthalmology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Port has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 682 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 13 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 8 papers in Ophthalmology. Recurrent topics in Michael Port's work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (15 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers). Michael Port is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (15 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers). Michael Port collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Michael Port's co-authors include Jason Berwick, Noah Porter, James V. Stone, Graeme P. Young, Nicola M. Hunkin, John Porrill, R. Kevin Wood, Aneurin J. Kennerley, John E. W. Mayhew and Brad Hall and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Michael Port

31 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Port United Kingdom 14 293 177 163 143 119 34 682
Russell J. Adams Canada 15 425 1.5× 187 1.1× 90 0.6× 52 0.4× 201 1.7× 43 985
Sandra M. Brown United States 21 236 0.8× 320 1.8× 62 0.4× 108 0.8× 599 5.0× 72 1.3k
John P. Sheppard United States 19 447 1.5× 115 0.6× 162 1.0× 62 0.4× 32 0.3× 63 1.1k
Alexander Krüger Germany 17 138 0.5× 291 1.6× 91 0.6× 31 0.2× 203 1.7× 58 919
Rosaria Sacco Switzerland 19 223 0.8× 196 1.1× 46 0.3× 55 0.4× 221 1.9× 45 1.5k
Rebecca A. Berman United States 20 1.1k 3.9× 126 0.7× 175 1.1× 39 0.3× 55 0.5× 33 1.5k
Irina Pivneva United States 13 411 1.4× 69 0.4× 157 1.0× 227 1.6× 89 0.7× 43 1.0k
Nick Fogt United States 14 313 1.1× 243 1.4× 21 0.1× 314 2.2× 313 2.6× 51 993
María A. Bermúdez Spain 21 264 0.9× 82 0.5× 19 0.1× 129 0.9× 87 0.7× 52 1.1k
Kaivon Pakzad-Vaezi Canada 15 433 1.5× 197 1.1× 91 0.6× 53 0.4× 366 3.1× 27 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Port

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Port's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Port with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Port more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Port

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Port. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Port. The network helps show where Michael Port may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Port

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Port. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Port based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Port. Michael Port is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kristof, Arnold S., Nadia Boufaied, Roupen Hatzakorzian, et al.. (2025). Biological responses during high-dose protein nutrition in the critically ill: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 122(2). 612–623.
2.
Reynolds, Steven, et al.. (2013). A system for accurate and automated injection of hyperpolarized substrate with minimal dead time and scalable volumes over a large range. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 239. 1–8. 5 indexed citations
3.
Stafford, Tom, Martin Thirkettle, Nicolas Vautrelle, et al.. (2012). A Novel Task for the Investigation of Action Acquisition. PLoS ONE. 7(6). e37749–e37749. 26 indexed citations
4.
Devonshire, Ian M., N. Papadakis, Michael Port, et al.. (2011). Neurovascular coupling is brain region-dependent. NeuroImage. 59(3). 1997–2006. 99 indexed citations
5.
Buckley, David, et al.. (2010). Deaf and hearing children: a comparison of peripheral vision development. Developmental Science. 14(4). 725–737. 39 indexed citations
6.
Martin, Chris, Jason Berwick, Dave Johnston, et al.. (2002). Optical imaging spectroscopy in the unanaesthetised rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 120(1). 25–34. 48 indexed citations
7.
Paley, M., J. E. W. Mayhew, Jason Berwick, et al.. (2001). Design and initial evaluation of a low-cost 3-Tesla research system for combined optical and functional MR imaging with interventional capability. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 13(1). 87–92. 6 indexed citations
8.
Stone, James V., Nicola M. Hunkin, John Porrill, et al.. (2001). When is now? Perception of simultaneity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 268(1462). 31–38. 165 indexed citations
9.
Young, Graeme P., et al.. (1997). Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials.. PubMed. 23(4). 249–58. 36 indexed citations
10.
Woodward, E. Geoffrey, et al.. (1995). Surface wettability and hydrophilicity of soft contact lens materials, before and after wear. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 15(5). 529–532. 11 indexed citations
11.
Woods, Russell L., John E. Saunders, & Michael Port. (1994). Concentric-design rigid bifocal lenses, part III: predicting vision from optical measurement. Journal of The British Contact Lens Association. 17(2). 51–57. 3 indexed citations
12.
Woods, Russell L., John E. Saunders, & Michael Port. (1993). Optical Performance of Decentered Bifocal Contact Lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 70(3). 171–184. 16 indexed citations
13.
Majeska, Robert J., Michael Port, & Thomas A. Einhorn. (1993). Attachment to extracellular matrix molecules by cells differing in the expression of osteoblastic traits. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 8(3). 277–289. 42 indexed citations
14.
Young, Graeme P. & Michael Port. (1992). Rigid Gas-Permeable Extended Wear: A Comparative Clinical Study. Optometry and Vision Science. 69(3). 213–226. 10 indexed citations
15.
Woodward, E. Geoffrey, et al.. (1992). Retrospective study of optometric referrals. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 12(4). 395–399. 3 indexed citations
16.
Port, Michael, et al.. (1991). Tear Characteristics of the VDU Operator. Optometry and Vision Science. 68(10). 798–800. 13 indexed citations
17.
Port, Michael, et al.. (1990). The assessment of human tear volume. Journal of The British Contact Lens Association. 13(1). 76–82. 42 indexed citations
18.
Port, Michael. (1989). Referrals and notifications by optometrists within the UK: 1988 survey. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 9(1). 31–35. 10 indexed citations
19.
Port, Michael, et al.. (1988). Referrals and notifications by British optometrists. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 8(3). 323–326. 13 indexed citations
20.
Port, Michael. (1982). Curvature changes in dehydrating soft lenses (Part I). Journal of The British Contact Lens Association. 5(2). 42–53.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Russell J. Adams Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra M. Brown Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John P. Sheppard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexander Krüger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rosaria Sacco Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca A. Berman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Irina Pivneva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nick Fogt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by María A. Bermúdez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kaivon Pakzad-Vaezi
Rankless by CCL
2026