Michael Parker

23.3k total citations
50 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Michael Parker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Control and Systems Engineering and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Parker has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Michael Parker's work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (7 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (6 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers). Michael Parker is often cited by papers focused on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (7 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (6 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers). Michael Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Michael Parker's co-authors include Charles W. Luetje, Rodger Loutzenhiser, Joshua R. Sanes, David J. Adams, Shengli Zhao, T J Nutter, Javier Cuevas, David S. Bredt, Guoping Feng and Richard M. Schwartzstein and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Journal of Neuroscience and Circulation Research.

In The Last Decade

Michael Parker

44 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Parker United States 20 723 190 161 114 92 50 1.3k
Yan Yan China 27 891 1.2× 136 0.7× 124 0.8× 104 0.9× 91 1.0× 105 2.3k
Wenfu Wang China 21 898 1.2× 148 0.8× 65 0.4× 109 1.0× 64 0.7× 99 1.9k
Ingrid Wagner Germany 23 854 1.2× 143 0.8× 164 1.0× 130 1.1× 262 2.8× 65 2.4k
Pradeep Garg United States 22 439 0.6× 338 1.8× 101 0.6× 130 1.1× 73 0.8× 67 1.6k
David Lévy United States 20 736 1.0× 318 1.7× 144 0.9× 97 0.9× 110 1.2× 53 1.4k
Rosemary Wong United States 23 707 1.0× 71 0.4× 154 1.0× 62 0.5× 50 0.5× 54 1.5k
Marianne J. Legato United States 22 568 0.8× 124 0.7× 85 0.5× 182 1.6× 208 2.3× 72 2.2k
Irving E. Vega United States 22 1.1k 1.5× 168 0.9× 143 0.9× 394 3.5× 61 0.7× 55 1.9k
Jing An China 23 590 0.8× 245 1.3× 39 0.2× 96 0.8× 25 0.3× 92 1.4k
Dimitra K. Georgiou United States 14 725 1.0× 223 1.2× 38 0.2× 150 1.3× 39 0.4× 34 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Parker. The network helps show where Michael Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Parker. Michael Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Perenthaler, Elena, Soheil Yousefi, Kristina Lanko, et al.. (2025). BRAIN-MAGNET: A functional genomics atlas for interpretation of non-coding variants. Cell. 189(2). 676–695.e24.
3.
Parker, Michael, et al.. (2024). Is anybody watching: A multi-factor motivational framework for educational video engagement. Computers & Education. 222. 105148–105148.
4.
Parker, Michael, et al.. (2024). A Large Language Model Approach to Educational Survey Feedback Analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 35(2). 444–481. 16 indexed citations
5.
Pike, Andrew, et al.. (2022). Online Courses Provide Robust Learning Gains and Improve Learner Confidence in the Foundational Biomedical Sciences. Medical Science Educator. 32(6). 1425–1432.
6.
Parker, Michael & Douglas Bohl. (2020). Experimental Investigation of Finite Aspect Ratio Cylindrical Bodies for Accelerated Wind Applications. Fluids. 5(1). 25–25. 1 indexed citations
7.
McKown, Matthew, et al.. (2016). Changing Breeding Status of the Ashy Storm-petrel Oceanodroma Homochroa on Anacapa Island, California. Marine ornithology. 44(1). 3 indexed citations
8.
Cheah, Phaik Yeong, Decha Tangseefa, François Nosten, et al.. (2015). Perceived Benefits, Harms, and Views About How to Share Data Responsibly. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 10(3). 278–289. 50 indexed citations
9.
Grozeva, Detelina, Keren Carss, Olivera Spasić-Bošković, et al.. (2014). De Novo Loss-of-Function Mutations in SETD5, Encoding a Methyltransferase in a 3p25 Microdeletion Syndrome Critical Region, Cause Intellectual Disability. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 94(4). 618–624. 89 indexed citations
10.
Parker, Michael, et al.. (2014). Computer Control of Drug Delivery by Continuous Intravenous Infusion. Anesthesiology. 122(3). 647–658. 17 indexed citations
11.
Lovich, Mark A., et al.. (2012). Delivery interaction between co‐infused medications: an in vitro modeling study of microinfusion. Pediatric Anesthesia. 23(1). 33–39. 22 indexed citations
12.
Feller‐Kopman, David, Michael Parker, & Richard M. Schwartzstein. (2009). Assessment of Pleural Pressure in the Evaluation of Pleural Effusions. CHEST Journal. 135(1). 201–209. 45 indexed citations
13.
Patel, Avignat S., Carl R. O’Donnell, Michael Parker, & David H. Roberts. (2007). Diaphragm Paralysis Definitively Diagnosed by Ultrasonography and Postural Dependence of Dynamic Lung Volumes after Seven Decades of Dysfunction. Lung. 185(1). 15–20. 18 indexed citations
14.
Parker, Michael & Sam D. Shemie. (2002). Pro/con ethics debate: should mechanical ventilation be continued to allow for progression to brain death so that organs can be donated?. Critical Care. 6(5). 399–399. 17 indexed citations
15.
Parker, Michael, et al.. (2002). Effects of Pyridine Ring Substitutions on Affinity, Efficacy, and Subtype Selectivity of Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Agonist Epibatidine. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 302(3). 1246–1252. 31 indexed citations
16.
Parker, Michael, Scott C. Harvey, & Charles W. Luetje. (2001). Determinants of Agonist Binding Affinity on Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor β Subunits. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 299(1). 385–391. 13 indexed citations
17.
Parker, Michael. (2000). Public deliberation and private choice in genetics and reproduction. Journal of Medical Ethics. 26(3). 160–165. 20 indexed citations
18.
Parker, Michael, et al.. (1998). Neuronal nicotinic receptor beta2 and beta4 subunits confer large differences in agonist binding affinity.. PubMed. 54(6). 1132–9. 149 indexed citations
19.
James, David, Michael Parker, & John Smoleniec. (1992). Comprehensive fetal assessment with three ultrasonographic characteristics. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 166(5). 1486–1495. 25 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Michael, Michael J. Lyon, & Richard R. Gacek. (1988). Ultrastructure of Contralaterally Projecting Vestibular Efferent Neurons in the Cat. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 114(5). 545–549. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026