Michael P. Meara

516 total citations
29 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Michael P. Meara is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael P. Meara has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Michael P. Meara's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (16 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (9 papers). Michael P. Meara is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (16 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (9 papers). Michael P. Meara collaborates with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Michael P. Meara's co-authors include Jeffrey W. Hazey, Edward L. Jones, Kyle A. Perry, Matthew Pittman, Curtis E. Bower, Christopher A. Durham, Paul J. Schenarts, Colleen M. Alexander, Xiaohong Chen and John R. Porterfield and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Surgical Endoscopy and Journal of Surgical Research.

In The Last Decade

Michael P. Meara

26 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael P. Meara United States 12 312 94 84 55 43 29 346
Jerome Lyn-Sue United States 11 284 0.9× 66 0.7× 80 1.0× 15 0.3× 14 0.3× 21 320
Amy Yetasook United States 10 419 1.3× 214 2.3× 105 1.3× 129 2.3× 33 0.8× 26 449
Stephen Haggerty United States 11 207 0.7× 27 0.3× 91 1.1× 10 0.2× 39 0.9× 25 273
Guido Leman Belgium 10 481 1.5× 127 1.4× 165 2.0× 14 0.3× 13 0.3× 17 506
Eleonora Farinella Italy 8 369 1.2× 191 2.0× 58 0.7× 87 1.6× 86 2.0× 14 398
Marek Polomsky United States 12 450 1.4× 173 1.8× 218 2.6× 65 1.2× 3 0.1× 20 505
Todd Wilson United States 10 426 1.4× 53 0.6× 87 1.0× 3 0.1× 25 0.6× 28 458
Andrea Sironi Italy 14 422 1.4× 275 2.9× 98 1.2× 143 2.6× 8 0.2× 24 488
Marion van der Kolk Netherlands 7 140 0.4× 15 0.2× 52 0.6× 13 0.2× 7 0.2× 12 202
Jorge Rabaza United States 12 470 1.5× 50 0.5× 183 2.2× 4 0.1× 55 1.3× 15 480

Countries citing papers authored by Michael P. Meara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael P. Meara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael P. Meara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael P. Meara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael P. Meara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael P. Meara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael P. Meara. The network helps show where Michael P. Meara may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael P. Meara

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael P. Meara. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael P. Meara based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael P. Meara. Michael P. Meara is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Merritt, Robert E., André Teixeira, Bradley Needleman, et al.. (2025). A prospective, nonrandomized clinical investigation of the da Vinci surgical system model IS5000. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 19(1). 650–650.
2.
Hewitt, D. Brock, et al.. (2025). Utilizing objective performance indicators to assess resident autonomy during robotic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(3). 1793–1800.
3.
Meara, Michael P., et al.. (2024). Behind the pattern: General surgery resident autonomy in robotic surgery. Heliyon. 10(11). e31691–e31691. 1 indexed citations
4.
Griffiths, Claire, Michael P. Meara, B.K. Poulose, et al.. (2024). Laparoscopic vs robotic inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of learning curves and skill transference in general surgery residents. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(6). 3346–3352. 1 indexed citations
5.
Meara, Michael P., et al.. (2023). Is Robotic Console Time a Surrogate for Resident Operative Autonomy?. Journal of surgical education. 80(11). 1711–1716. 6 indexed citations
6.
Tamer, Robert, et al.. (2023). What factors impact surgical operative time when teaching a resident in the operating room. Heliyon. 9(6). e16554–e16554. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stewart, Camille L., Courtney Green, Michael P. Meara, et al.. (2023). Common Components of General Surgery Robotic Educational Programs. Journal of surgical education. 80(11). 1717–1722. 7 indexed citations
8.
Porterfield, John R., Dina Podolsky, Conrad Ballecer, et al.. (2023). Structured Resident Training in Robotic Surgery: Recommendations of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group. Journal of surgical education. 81(1). 9–16. 12 indexed citations
9.
Meara, Michael P., et al.. (2023). What influences general surgery residents’ prospective entrustment and operative time in robotic inguinal hernia repairs. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(10). 7908–7913. 1 indexed citations
10.
Petro, Clayton C., Samuel J. Zolin, David Renton, et al.. (2022). Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(3). 2143–2153. 23 indexed citations
11.
Meara, Michael P., et al.. (2022). Distortions in the Balance Between Teaching and Efficiency in the Operating Room. Journal of Surgical Research. 283. 110–117. 4 indexed citations
12.
Ramsey, Mitchell L., Somashekar G. Krishna, Alice Hinton, et al.. (2021). Outcomes of inpatient cholecystectomy among adults with cystic fibrosis in the United States. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 13(9). 371–381. 2 indexed citations
13.
Wang, Vivian, et al.. (2020). Expectations versus reality: trainee participation on the robotic console in academic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(8). 4805–4810. 7 indexed citations
14.
Meara, Michael P., et al.. (2019). A direct comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hernia repair: patient-reported outcomes and cost analysis. Hernia. 23(6). 1115–1121. 35 indexed citations
15.
Meara, Michael P. & Colleen M. Alexander. (2018). Emergency Presentations of Diverticulitis. Surgical Clinics of North America. 98(5). 1025–1046. 5 indexed citations
16.
Deal, Shanley B., Adnan Alseidi, Jeffrey G. Chipman, et al.. (2018). Identifying Priorities for Faculty Development in General Surgery Using the Delphi Consensus Method. Journal of surgical education. 75(6). 1504–1512. 15 indexed citations
17.
Strosberg, David, et al.. (2016). Incidence of abdominal wall metastases following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in patients with head and neck cancer. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(9). 3623–3627. 20 indexed citations
18.
Pearl, Jonathan P., Erika K Fellinger, Brian J. Dunkin, et al.. (2016). Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(8). 3184–3190. 9 indexed citations
19.
Durham, Christopher A., et al.. (2010). Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost comparison. Surgical Endoscopy. 25(5). 1553–1558. 36 indexed citations
20.
Meara, Michael P., et al.. (2010). Surgical Resident Education: What Is the Department's Price for Commitment?. Journal of surgical education. 67(6). 427–431. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026