Michael M. Walker

3.7k total citations
79 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Michael M. Walker is a scholar working on Ecology, Biophysics and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael M. Walker has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Ecology, 19 papers in Biophysics and 17 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Michael M. Walker's work include Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (19 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (17 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (14 papers). Michael M. Walker is often cited by papers focused on Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (19 papers), Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects (17 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (14 papers). Michael M. Walker collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Michael M. Walker's co-authors include Joseph L. Kirschvink, M. E. Bitterman, Colin Green, Carol E. Diebel, Todd E. Dennis, John C. Montgomery, Cordula V. Mora, Andrew E. Dizon, Michael Davison and Patricia M. Pankhurst and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Michael M. Walker

75 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael M. Walker United States 24 944 942 678 400 341 79 2.6k
John B. Phillips United States 45 1.8k 1.9× 1.8k 1.9× 608 0.9× 490 1.2× 434 1.3× 162 6.4k
Robert C. Beason United States 23 723 0.8× 653 0.7× 337 0.5× 113 0.3× 115 0.3× 38 1.5k
Miriam Liedvogel Germany 26 997 1.1× 608 0.6× 168 0.2× 172 0.4× 211 0.6× 60 2.3k
James L. Gould United States 33 628 0.7× 613 0.7× 557 0.8× 249 0.6× 438 1.3× 77 3.8k
Charles D. Walcott United States 26 725 0.8× 382 0.4× 296 0.4× 127 0.3× 166 0.5× 66 1.9k
Catherine M. F. Lohmann United States 20 1.3k 1.4× 355 0.4× 214 0.3× 988 2.5× 100 0.3× 29 2.0k
Hynek Burda Germany 39 2.0k 2.1× 758 0.8× 295 0.4× 122 0.3× 413 1.2× 173 4.4k
Kenneth J. Lohmann United States 42 3.1k 3.3× 1.2k 1.3× 779 1.1× 2.3k 5.8× 297 0.9× 108 5.5k
Ursula Munro Australia 24 852 0.9× 857 0.9× 299 0.4× 79 0.2× 57 0.2× 54 1.5k
Rachel Muheim Sweden 27 1.1k 1.1× 593 0.6× 159 0.2× 145 0.4× 43 0.1× 45 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Walker. The network helps show where Michael M. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael M. Walker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael M. Walker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael M. Walker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael M. Walker. Michael M. Walker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Love, Joseph W., et al.. (2024). Changes in Fish Communities Before and After Establishment of Northern Snakehead in an Estuarine Marsh of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 15(2). 380–394.
3.
Cheeseman, James F., Rachel M. Fewster, & Michael M. Walker. (2017). Circadian and circatidal clocks control the mechanism of semilunar foraging behaviour. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 3780–3780. 8 indexed citations
4.
Turner, Rebecca M., Michael M. Walker, & Claire Postlethwaite. (2016). Literal grid map models for animal navigation: Assumptions and predictions. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 404. 169–181. 4 indexed citations
5.
Postlethwaite, Claire & Michael M. Walker. (2014). A model for navigational errors in complex environmental fields. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 363. 134–144. 3 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Michael M.. (2012). Navigating oceans and cultures: Polynesian and European navigation systems in the late eighteenth century. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 42(2). 93–98. 4 indexed citations
7.
Mora, Cordula V. & Michael M. Walker. (2012). Consistent effect of an attached magnet on the initial orientation of homing pigeons, Columba livia. Animal Behaviour. 84(2). 377–383. 9 indexed citations
8.
Dennis, Todd E., Matt J. Rayner, & Michael M. Walker. (2007). Evidence that pigeons orient to geomagnetic intensity during homing. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 274(1614). 1153–1158. 78 indexed citations
9.
Walker, Michael M., et al.. (2007). Evidence of homing following translocation of long‐tailed bats ( Chalinolobus tuberculatus ) at Grand Canyon Cave, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 34(3). 239–246. 9 indexed citations
10.
Walker, Michael M.. (2007). A model for encoding of magnetic field intensity by magnetite-based magnetoreceptor cells. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 250(1). 85–91. 53 indexed citations
11.
Mora, Cordula V., Michael Davison, J. Martin Wild, & Michael M. Walker. (2004). Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon. Nature. 432(7016). 508–511. 213 indexed citations
12.
Diebel, Carol E., et al.. (2000). Magnetite defines a vertebrate magnetoreceptor. Nature. 406(6793). 299–302. 186 indexed citations
13.
Wiltschko, Roswitha, Michael M. Walker, & Wolfgang Wiltschko. (2000). Sun-Compass Orientation in Homing Pigeons: Compensation for Different Rates of Change in Azimuth?. Journal of Experimental Biology. 203(5). 889–894. 26 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Michael M., et al.. (1997). Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense. Nature. 390(6658). 371–376. 321 indexed citations
15.
Walker, Michael M., P.I. Mayo, K. O’Grady, S.W. Charles, & R.W. Chantrell. (1993). The magnetic properties of single-domain particles with cubic anisotropy. I. Hysteresis loops. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 5(17). 2779–2792. 68 indexed citations
16.
Walker, Michael M., et al.. (1989). Failure of stationary but not of flying honeybees (Apis mellifera) to respond to magnetic field stimuli.. Journal of comparative psychology. 103(1). 62–69. 28 indexed citations
17.
Walker, Michael M.. (1984). Larval life span, larval settlement, and early growth of Evechinus chloroticus (Valenciennes). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 18(4). 393–397. 23 indexed citations
18.
Walker, Michael M.. (1982). Reproductive periodicity in Evechinus chloroticus in the Hauraki Gulf. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 16(1). 19–25. 22 indexed citations
19.
Walker, Michael M., Andrew E. Dizon, & Joseph L. Kirschvink. (1982). Geomagnetic field detection by yellowfin tuna. 3. 755–758. 7 indexed citations
20.
Walker, Michael M.. (1981). Influence of season on growth of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 15(2). 201–205. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026