Michael M. Morlock

11.5k total citations
316 papers, 8.5k citations indexed

About

Michael M. Morlock is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael M. Morlock has authored 316 papers receiving a total of 8.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 234 papers in Surgery, 44 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 42 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Michael M. Morlock's work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (170 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (117 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (109 papers). Michael M. Morlock is often cited by papers focused on Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (170 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (117 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (109 papers). Michael M. Morlock collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Michael M. Morlock's co-authors include Nicholas E. Bishop, Gerd Huber, Erich Schneider, M. Honl, Klaus Püschel, Nils Götzen, Wolfgang Lehmann, Markus Windolf, Kay Sellenschloh and W. Rüther and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biomaterials.

In The Last Decade

Michael M. Morlock

306 papers receiving 8.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael M. Morlock Germany 49 6.2k 1.5k 844 834 809 316 8.5k
Luca Cristofolini Italy 45 5.5k 0.9× 1.8k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 1.6k 1.9× 409 0.5× 226 7.5k
Nico Verdonschot Netherlands 55 8.2k 1.3× 3.1k 2.1× 901 1.1× 948 1.1× 520 0.6× 450 10.5k
K.D.K. Luk Hong Kong 49 4.4k 0.7× 2.6k 1.8× 440 0.5× 704 0.8× 390 0.5× 174 8.2k
Dale R. Sumner United States 51 5.2k 0.8× 3.2k 2.2× 728 0.9× 1.2k 1.4× 424 0.5× 201 8.6k
Maximilian Rudert Germany 37 3.3k 0.5× 1.3k 0.9× 320 0.4× 1.3k 1.5× 312 0.4× 321 5.6k
Damien Lacroix United Kingdom 38 2.1k 0.3× 2.8k 1.9× 880 1.0× 484 0.6× 306 0.4× 110 4.9k
Jorge O. Galante United States 68 11.9k 1.9× 3.8k 2.6× 559 0.7× 1.2k 1.5× 836 1.0× 204 14.9k
H.S. Gill United Kingdom 60 11.0k 1.8× 1.5k 1.0× 439 0.5× 742 0.9× 770 1.0× 282 12.2k
Elise F. Morgan United States 44 3.6k 0.6× 2.9k 2.0× 1.4k 1.7× 2.8k 3.3× 417 0.5× 125 8.8k
Glen L. Niebur United States 38 2.5k 0.4× 2.1k 1.4× 638 0.8× 1.8k 2.2× 295 0.4× 97 5.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Morlock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Morlock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Morlock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Morlock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Morlock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Morlock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Morlock. The network helps show where Michael M. Morlock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael M. Morlock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael M. Morlock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael M. Morlock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael M. Morlock. Michael M. Morlock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Lampe, Frank, et al.. (2025). Dynamic response of soft tissue can be disregarded during femoral stem impaction. Clinical Biomechanics. 125. 106530–106530.
3.
Huber, Gerd, et al.. (2024). Vibratory insertion of press-fit acetabular components requires less force than a single blow technique. Bone and Joint Research. 13(6). 272–278. 1 indexed citations
4.
Morlock, Michael M., et al.. (2024). Influence of the type of stem and its fixation on revision and immediate postoperative mortality in elective total hip arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 106-B(3 Supple A). 130–136. 4 indexed citations
5.
Lampe, Frank, et al.. (2023). Stem size and stem alignment affects periprosthetic fracture risk and primary stability in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 42(4). 829–836. 5 indexed citations
6.
Sellenschloh, Kay, et al.. (2023). Festigkeit der Konusverbindung modularer Revisionshüftschäfte. Die Orthopädie. 53(1). 47–55.
7.
Beverland, David, et al.. (2022). Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today. 14. 14–21. 17 indexed citations
8.
Steinbrück, Arnd, et al.. (2022). Modified acetabular component liner designs are not superior to standard liners at reducing the risk of revision. The Bone & Joint Journal. 104-B(7). 801–810. 3 indexed citations
9.
Lampe, Frank, et al.. (2022). Influence of bone morphology and femur preparation method on the primary stability of hip revision stems. Journal of Orthopaedic Research®. 41(6). 1283–1290. 6 indexed citations
10.
Viezens, Lennart, Kay Sellenschloh, Klaus Püschel, et al.. (2021). Impact of Screw Diameter on Pedicle Screw Fatigue Strength—A Biomechanical Evaluation. World Neurosurgery. 152. e369–e376. 22 indexed citations
11.
Morlock, Michael M., et al.. (2020). Do SiNx coatings bear the potential to reduce the risk of micromotion in modular taper junctions?. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 234(9). 897–908. 4 indexed citations
12.
Huber, Gerd, et al.. (2019). Influence of flexural rigidity on micromotion at the head-stem taper interface of modular hip prostheses. Medical Engineering & Physics. 68(1). 1–10. 21 indexed citations
13.
Morlock, Michael M., et al.. (2019). Hüftendoprothetik beim jungen Patienten: Gleitpaarungen und Individualendoprothesen. Der Orthopäde. 48(4). 292–299. 1 indexed citations
14.
Rendenbach, Carsten, Claudius Steffen, Kay Sellenschloh, et al.. (2018). Patient specific glass fiber reinforced composite versus titanium plate: A comparative biomechanical analysis under cyclic dynamic loading. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 91. 212–219. 25 indexed citations
15.
Morlock, Michael M. & Markus Jäger. (2017). Endoprothetik des älteren Menschen: Biomaterialien, Implantatwahl, Verankerungstechnik. Der Orthopäde. 46(1). 4–17. 1 indexed citations
16.
Mathijssen, Nina M.C., et al.. (2016). Clinical and Wear Analyses of 9 Large Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prostheses. PLoS ONE. 11(10). e0163438–e0163438. 6 indexed citations
17.
Rosenau, Matthias, et al.. (2012). On the precision of sandbox experiments - insight from test-retest variability. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 7667. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hoenig, Elisa, Thomas E. Winkler, Christiane Goepfert, et al.. (2011). High Amplitude Direct Compressive Strain Enhances Mechanical Properties of Scaffold-Free Tissue-Engineered Cartilage. Tissue Engineering Part A. 17(9-10). 1401–1411. 42 indexed citations
19.
Honl, M., Volker Carrero, Frank Lampe, et al.. (2003). COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED AND MANUAL IMPLANTATION OF A PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 85(8). 1470–1478. 170 indexed citations
20.
Choi, et al.. (1990). Possible role of H1 histone in the differentiation of mouse erythroleukemia cells. Cell Biology International Reports. 14(5). 457–462. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luca Cristofolini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nico Verdonschot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K.D.K. Luk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dale R. Sumner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maximilian Rudert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Damien Lacroix Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jorge O. Galante Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H.S. Gill Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elise F. Morgan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Glen L. Niebur
Rankless by CCL
2026