Michael Krug

592 total citations
9 papers, 365 citations indexed

About

Michael Krug is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Krug has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 365 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 6 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Michael Krug's work include Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (3 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers). Michael Krug is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (3 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers). Michael Krug collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Michael Krug's co-authors include Dietmar Quandt, Marcus Lehnert, Michael Kessler, Timothy Y. James, Susana Magallón, Michael E. Alfaro, David L. Swofford, A. Elizabeth Arnold, Valérie Reeb and François Lutzoni and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Biogeography and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Michael Krug

9 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Michael Krug

PS

EEBS

MB

CB

NLC

Kazutoshi Nagasaka Japan

Ran Wei China

Jessica M. Budke United States

Nicholas D. Levsen United States

Michael Gruenstaeudl Germany

Jeng‐Der Chung Taiwan

Milan Štech Czechia

Charlotte C. Germain‐Aubrey United States

Roman Businský Czechia

Kazutoshi Nagasaka Japan

Michael Krug

241 ×1.0

PS

133 ×0.6

EEBS

217 ×2.1

MB

83 ×1.1

CB

60 ×2.1

NLC

Citations per year, relative to Michael Krug Michael Krug (= 1×) peers Kazutoshi Nagasaka

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Krug

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Krug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Krug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Krug more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Krug

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Krug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Krug. The network helps show where Michael Krug may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Krug

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Krug. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Krug based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Krug. Michael Krug is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Schneeweiss, Gerald M., Miguel A. Garcı́a, Michael Krug, et al.. (2020). A multilocus phylogeny of the non-photosynthetic parasitic plant Cistanche (Orobanchaceae) refutes current taxonomy and identifies four major morphologically distinct clades. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 151. 106898–106898. 12 indexed citations

2.

Lehnert, Marcus & Michael Krug. (2019). Evolution of substrate specificity and fungal symbiosis in filmy ferns (Hymenophyllaceae): a Bayesian approach for ambiguous character state reconstruction. Symbiosis. 78(2). 141–147. 2 indexed citations

3.

Krug, Michael, et al.. (2018). Morphology, geographic distribution, and host preferences are poor predictors of phylogenetic relatedness in the mistletoe genus Viscum L.. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 131. 106–115. 26 indexed citations

4.

Lutzoni, François, Michael Nowak, Michael E. Alfaro, et al.. (2018). Contemporaneous radiations of fungi and plants linked to symbiosis. Nature Communications. 9(1). 5451–5451. 187 indexed citations

5.

Kessler, Michael, et al.. (2017). Biogeography of the Gondwanan tree fern family Dicksoniaceae—A tale of vicariance, dispersal and extinction. Journal of Biogeography. 44(11). 2648–2659. 43 indexed citations

6.

Lehnert, Marcus, Michael Krug, & Michael Kessler. (2016). A review of symbiotic fungal endophytes in lycophytes and ferns – a global phylogenetic and ecological perspective. Symbiosis. 71(2). 77–89. 35 indexed citations

7.

Ignatov, Michael S., et al.. (2015). On the systematic position of the moss genus Catoscopium, with a new approach to the peristome reduction study. Arctoa. 24(1). 389–415. 13 indexed citations

8.

Buchbender, Volker, Helena Hespanhol, Michael Krug, et al.. (2014). <strong>Phylogenetic reconstructions of the Hedwigiaceae reveal cryptic speciation and hybridisation in <em>Hedwigia</em></strong>. Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution. 36(1). 1–1. 21 indexed citations

9.

Borsch, Thomas, et al.. (2012). Phylogenetics of early branching eudicots: Comparing phylogenetic signal across plastid introns, spacers, and genes. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 50(2). 85–108. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact