Michael Janský

679 total citations
69 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

Michael Janský is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Janský has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 13 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Michael Janský's work include Health and Medical Studies (29 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (12 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers). Michael Janský is often cited by papers focused on Health and Medical Studies (29 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (12 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers). Michael Janský collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Michael Janský's co-authors include Julian Wangler, Andreas Fellgiebel, Erik Farin‐Glattacker, Harald Binder, M Nguyen-Tat, Klaus Kaier, Bernd Röhrig, Michael Schulz, Johannes Jäger and Sabine Fischbeck and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Geriatrics.

In The Last Decade

Michael Janský

61 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Janský Germany 11 229 74 68 57 50 69 343
Julian Wangler Germany 11 225 1.0× 72 1.0× 68 1.0× 55 1.0× 50 1.0× 64 333
Ulrike Stentzel Germany 11 112 0.5× 72 1.0× 43 0.6× 74 1.3× 62 1.2× 26 330
Rosanna O'Connor United Kingdom 5 134 0.6× 62 0.8× 39 0.6× 14 0.2× 33 0.7× 5 389
Gerard Molleman Netherlands 11 260 1.1× 113 1.5× 35 0.5× 20 0.4× 33 0.7× 52 402
Roos Arends Netherlands 8 167 0.7× 50 0.7× 40 0.6× 22 0.4× 43 0.9× 13 287
Tisha L. Deen United States 9 157 0.7× 79 1.1× 44 0.6× 26 0.5× 127 2.5× 12 319
Mette Haaland‐Øverby Norway 7 170 0.7× 44 0.6× 37 0.5× 34 0.6× 42 0.8× 14 303
Toto Gronlund United Kingdom 7 170 0.7× 94 1.3× 83 1.2× 15 0.3× 32 0.6× 15 373
Tanya T. Olmos‐Ochoa United States 10 155 0.7× 51 0.7× 57 0.8× 29 0.5× 33 0.7× 23 244
Jesse M. Hinde United States 11 178 0.8× 116 1.6× 19 0.3× 18 0.3× 41 0.8× 37 356

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Janský

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Janský's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Janský with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Janský more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Janský

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Janský. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Janský. The network helps show where Michael Janský may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Janský

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Janský. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Janský based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Janský. Michael Janský is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Farin‐Glattacker, Erik, et al.. (2024). DemStepCare: Risikostratifizierte Unterstützung der ambulanten Demenzversorgung – Bewertung aus hausärztlicher Perspektive. Psychiatrische Praxis. 51(6). 307–314. 2 indexed citations
3.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2024). Primary care involvement in clinical research – prerequisites, motivators, and barriers: results from a study series. Archives of Public Health. 82(1). 41–41. 3 indexed citations
4.
5.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2023). Wie demenzsensibel sind Hausärzt*innen? – eine explorierende Betrachtung von Einstellungs‑, Handlungs- und Kompetenzindikatoren zur Demenzversorgung. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. 20(3). 339–348. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2023). Nutzungsvoraussetzungen und Einfluss von Arztbewertungsportalen – Befunde einer Befragungsstudie. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. 19(3). 343–349.
7.
Janský, Michael, et al.. (2023). Gesundheits-Apps in der hausärztlichen Versorgung. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. 19(3). 350–357. 1 indexed citations
9.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2023). What care needs do overweight and obese patients have in primary care?. 1 indexed citations
10.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2022). Welche Potenziale und Mehrwerte bieten DiGA für die hausärztliche Versorgung? – Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Hausärzt*innen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 65(12). 1334–1343. 16 indexed citations
11.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2022). Experiences with Innovation Fund healthcare models in primary care: a qualitative study amongst German general practitioners. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 174(3-4). 53–60. 1 indexed citations
12.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2022). Innovationsfonds und Primärversorgung – Welche Erwartungen und Erfahrungen vertreten Hausärzt*innen in Bezug auf die Teilnahme an innovativen Versorgungsmodellen?. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 65(6). 697–705. 2 indexed citations
13.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2021). What is the significance of guidelines in the primary care setting?. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 171(13-14). 321–329. 10 indexed citations
14.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2021). Attitudes to and experience of disease management programs in primary care—an exploratory survey of general practitioners in Germany. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 171(13-14). 310–320. 8 indexed citations
15.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2021). Prerequisites for providing effective support to family caregivers within the primary care setting – results of a study series in Germany. BMC Family Practice. 22(1). 252–252. 4 indexed citations
16.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2021). Support, needs and expectations of family caregivers regarding general practitioners – results from an online survey. BMC Family Practice. 22(1). 47–47. 17 indexed citations
17.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2020). Diagnostik erhöhter Leberwerte in der hausärztlichen Versorgung – Eine Befragung zu Voraussetzungen, Vorgehen und erlebten Herausforderungen von Allgemeinmedizinern. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie. 60(8). 1203–1211. 5 indexed citations
18.
Wangler, Julian & Michael Janský. (2019). Dementia diagnostics in general practitioner care. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 170(9-10). 230–237. 18 indexed citations
19.
Wangler, Julian, et al.. (2018). Diagnostik und Versorgung der Demenz — eine Herausforderung für die Hausarztmedizin. Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin. 94(1). 12–16. 6 indexed citations
20.
Wangler, Julian, Andreas Fellgiebel, & Michael Janský. (2018). Das Praxispersonal im Kontext der hausärztlichen Demenzerkennung – ein ungehobenes Potenzial?. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 52(7). 661–666. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026