Michael Jaeger

1.9k total citations
76 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Michael Jaeger is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Jaeger has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 48 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 18 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Michael Jaeger's work include Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (56 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (32 papers) and Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (23 papers). Michael Jaeger is often cited by papers focused on Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (56 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (32 papers) and Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (23 papers). Michael Jaeger collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Michael Jaeger's co-authors include Martin Frenz, J.J. Niederhauser, P. Weber, Robert Lemor, Stefan Preißer, Sara Peeters, Jeffrey C. Bamber, Simon Schüpbach, Maju Kuriakose and Marjaneh Hejazi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Applied Physics Letters.

In The Last Decade

Michael Jaeger

70 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Jaeger Switzerland 22 1.2k 927 626 47 38 76 1.4k
Wenfeng Xia United Kingdom 21 1.3k 1.1× 778 0.8× 442 0.7× 52 1.1× 9 0.2× 83 1.4k
Daniel R. Reinecke United States 16 1.6k 1.3× 897 1.0× 809 1.3× 58 1.2× 14 0.4× 27 1.7k
Robert A. Kruger United States 19 1.6k 1.4× 986 1.1× 753 1.2× 88 1.9× 13 0.3× 56 1.8k
Bastien Arnal United States 15 898 0.8× 657 0.7× 219 0.3× 46 1.0× 7 0.2× 45 1.0k
Parsin Haji Reza Canada 20 939 0.8× 323 0.3× 592 0.9× 81 1.7× 8 0.2× 64 1.1k
Sarah Patch United States 15 605 0.5× 302 0.3× 318 0.5× 48 1.0× 25 0.7× 42 732
Stefan Preißer Switzerland 12 428 0.4× 234 0.3× 183 0.3× 56 1.2× 43 1.1× 17 498
William L. Kiser United States 13 908 0.8× 429 0.5× 499 0.8× 104 2.2× 10 0.3× 23 988
James A. Guggenheim United Kingdom 12 473 0.4× 218 0.2× 181 0.3× 174 3.7× 11 0.3× 46 599
Jurriaan F. Bakker Netherlands 20 1.0k 0.8× 487 0.5× 143 0.2× 163 3.5× 10 0.3× 24 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Jaeger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Jaeger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Jaeger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Jaeger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Jaeger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Jaeger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Jaeger. The network helps show where Michael Jaeger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Jaeger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Jaeger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Jaeger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Jaeger. Michael Jaeger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frenz, Martin, et al.. (2024). Pulse-echo ultrasound attenuation tomography. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 69(11). 115016–115016.
2.
Orlova, Anna, et al.. (2023). Improvement of Optoacoustic Angiographic Images Using One-Dimensional Deconvolution with Adaptive Real-Time Self-Calibration. Acoustical Physics. 69(6). 914–920. 1 indexed citations
3.
Becchetti, Chiara, et al.. (2023). First-in-human diagnostic study of hepatic steatosis with computed ultrasound tomography in echo mode. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 176–176. 13 indexed citations
4.
Gerber, Urs, et al.. (2023). Excluding Echo Shift Noise in Real-Time Pulse-Echo Speed-of-Sound Imaging. Sensors. 23(12). 5598–5598. 3 indexed citations
5.
Jaeger, Michael, et al.. (2023). Windowed Radon Transform for Robust Speed-of-Sound Imaging With Pulse-Echo Ultrasound. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 43(4). 1579–1593. 3 indexed citations
6.
Orlova, Anna, et al.. (2023). Improvement of optoacoustic angiographic images using one-dimensional deconvolution with adaptive real-time self-calibration. Акустический журнал. 69(6). 800–807.
7.
Kuriakose, Maju, et al.. (2020). Improved forward model for quantitative pulse-echo speed-of-sound imaging. Ultrasonics. 108. 106168–106168. 67 indexed citations
8.
Singh, Mithun Kuniyil Ajith, Michael Jaeger, Martin Frenz, & Wiendelt Steenbergen. (2017). Photoacoustic reflection artifact reduction using photoacoustic-guided focused ultrasound: comparison between plane-wave and element-by-element synthetic backpropagation approach. Biomedical Optics Express. 8(4). 2245–2245. 13 indexed citations
9.
Singh, Mithun Kuniyil Ajith, Michael Jaeger, Martin Frenz, & Wiendelt Steenbergen. (2016). In vivo demonstration of reflection artifact reduction in photoacoustic imaging using synthetic aperture photoacoustic-guided focused ultrasound (PAFUSion). Biomedical Optics Express. 7(8). 2955–2955. 39 indexed citations
10.
Jaeger, Michael, et al.. (2015). Full correction for spatially distributed speed-of-sound in echo ultrasound based on measuring aberration delays via transmit beam steering. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 60(11). 4497–4515. 57 indexed citations
11.
Jaeger, Michael & Martin Frenz. (2015). Towards clinical computed ultrasound tomography in echo-mode: Dynamic range artefact reduction. Ultrasonics. 62. 299–304. 26 indexed citations
12.
Jaeger, Michael, et al.. (2014). Computed Ultrasound Tomography in Echo Mode for Imaging Speed of Sound Using Pulse-Echo Sonography: Proof of Principle. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 41(1). 235–250. 104 indexed citations
13.
Jaeger, Michael, Jeffrey C. Bamber, & Martin Frenz. (2013). Clutter elimination for deep clinical optoacoustic imaging using localised vibration tagging (LOVIT). Photoacoustics. 1(2). 19–29. 45 indexed citations
14.
Greisch, Jean‐François, et al.. (2013). Anti-PSMA antibody-coupled gold nanorods detection by optical and electron microscopies. Micron. 50. 68–74. 6 indexed citations
15.
Jaeger, Michael. (2012). Deformation-compensated averaging for clutter reduction in epiphotoacoustic imaging <italic>in vivo</italic>. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 17(6). 66007–66007. 33 indexed citations
16.
Jaeger, Michael, et al.. (2011). Improved contrast deep optoacoustic imaging using displacement-compensated averaging: breast tumour phantom studies. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 56(18). 5889–5901. 24 indexed citations
17.
Hejazi, Marjaneh, et al.. (2006). A Comparison of Laser-Ultrasound Detection System Sensitivity with a Broad-Band Ultrasonic Source for Biomedical Applications. Archives of Medical Research. 37(3). 322–327. 3 indexed citations
18.
Liu, Ji‐Bin, et al.. (2003). Acoustic microscopy system: design and preliminary results. Ultrasonics. 42(1-9). 337–341. 2 indexed citations
19.
Jaeger, Michael, V. S. Tsoǐ, & B. Golding. (1996). Lithographic point contacts for transverse electron focusing in bismuth. Applied Physics Letters. 68(9). 1282–1284. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026