Michael J. Ranger

624 total citations
22 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Michael J. Ranger is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Ranger has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Earth-Surface Processes, 9 papers in Atmospheric Science and 6 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Ranger's work include Geological formations and processes (19 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (9 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (6 papers). Michael J. Ranger is often cited by papers focused on Geological formations and processes (19 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (9 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (6 papers). Michael J. Ranger collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Pakistan. Michael J. Ranger's co-authors include S. George Pemberton, Murray K. Gingras, James A. MacEachern, Ron K. Pickerill, Shahin E. Dashtgard, D. K. McPhee, Dale A. Leckie, Jeffrey L. Kavanaugh, Mark L. Caplan and John‐Paul Zonneveld and has published in prestigious journals such as Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, Journal of Sedimentary Research and Sedimentary Geology.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Ranger

22 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Ranger Canada 10 216 124 98 58 52 22 250
Robert D. Hettinger United States 6 247 1.1× 196 1.6× 97 1.0× 54 0.9× 74 1.4× 14 308
Lee F. Krystinik United States 8 260 1.2× 215 1.7× 62 0.6× 40 0.7× 43 0.8× 17 324
James M. Borer United States 5 218 1.0× 153 1.2× 97 1.0× 34 0.6× 42 0.8× 7 254
H. de V. Wickens South Africa 5 281 1.3× 149 1.2× 106 1.1× 40 0.7× 58 1.1× 8 314
D. Hinds United Kingdom 4 174 0.8× 138 1.1× 85 0.9× 35 0.6× 57 1.1× 5 300
David Went United Kingdom 11 259 1.2× 208 1.7× 63 0.6× 82 1.4× 114 2.2× 22 350
M. Guy United States 5 301 1.4× 221 1.8× 101 1.0× 80 1.4× 54 1.0× 5 380
Michael H. Gardner United States 7 215 1.0× 141 1.1× 104 1.1× 36 0.6× 32 0.6× 21 264
G. Cavanna Italy 2 335 1.6× 232 1.9× 92 0.9× 55 0.9× 64 1.2× 4 390
Jennifer A. Wadsworth Australia 6 233 1.1× 211 1.7× 179 1.8× 59 1.0× 39 0.8× 9 331

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Ranger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Ranger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Ranger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Ranger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Ranger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Ranger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Ranger. The network helps show where Michael J. Ranger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Ranger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Ranger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Ranger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Ranger. Michael J. Ranger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (2023). Fluvial character and architecture of an outcrop using sedimentology combined with UAV-based modeling, Cretaceous McMurray Formation, NE Alberta, Canada. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 93(5). 273–292. 1 indexed citations
3.
MacEachern, James A., et al.. (2023). Sedimentological and ichnological variations in fluvio‐tidal translating point bars, McMurray Formation, Alberta, Canada. Sedimentology. 71(3). 974–1022. 5 indexed citations
4.
Chen, Qi, Jeffrey L. Kavanaugh, Murray K. Gingras, Michael J. Ranger, & James A. MacEachern. (2022). Recognizing genetically related depositional packages using 3D photogrammetric outcrop models in a fluvially dominated, tidally influenced meander-belt succession. Sedimentary Geology. 442. 106288–106288. 5 indexed citations
5.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Using structure-from-motion photogrammetry to recognize lateral versus forward accretion bedforms in the Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation, NE Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 66(4). 725–751. 4 indexed citations
6.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (2017). Analyzing Dune Foreset Cyclicity In Outcrop With Photogrammetry. Journal of Sedimentary Research. 87(1). 66–74. 10 indexed citations
7.
Gingras, Murray K., et al.. (2016). The significance of trace fossils in the McMurray Formation, Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 64(2). 233–250. 50 indexed citations
8.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (2016). Continental ichnology of the Lower McMurray Formation inclined heterolithic strata at Daphne Island, Athabasca River, north-eastern Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 64(2). 218–232. 11 indexed citations
9.
Gingras, Murray K., et al.. (2016). Laminae-scale rhythmicity of inclined heterolithic stratification, Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation, NE Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology. 64(2). 199–217. 12 indexed citations
10.
Ranger, Michael J., Murray K. Gingras, & S. George Pemberton. (2008). The Role of Ichnology in the Stratigraphic Interpretation of the Athabasca Oil Sands. 6 indexed citations
11.
Ranger, Michael J.. (2006). The Northeastern Sector of the Lower Cretaceous Athabasca Oil-Sands Basin: Facies and Fluids. 249–256. 5 indexed citations
13.
Caplan, Mark L. & Michael J. Ranger. (2001). Description and Interpretation of Coarsening-Upward Cycles in the McMurray Formation, Northeastern Alberta: Preliminary Results. 30–38. 4 indexed citations
14.
Ranger, Michael J. & S. George Pemberton. (1997). Elements of a Stratigraphic Framework for the McMurray Formation in South Athabasca Area, Alberta. 263–291. 37 indexed citations
15.
Ranger, Michael J.. (1994). A basin study of the southern Athabasca oil sands deposit. University of Alberta Library. 12 indexed citations
16.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (1994). Basins and Sub-Basins: Controls on Sedimentation and Stratigraphy of the Mannville Group. 24–25. 1 indexed citations
17.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (1994). Ichnology of Inclined Heterolithic Stratification in the McMurray Formation, Northeastern Alberta. 362–362. 1 indexed citations
18.
Ranger, Michael J., D. K. McPhee, & S. George Pemberton. (1994). Elements of a Stratigraphic Framework for the McMurray Formation in South Athabasca. 233–234. 11 indexed citations
19.
Ranger, Michael J., S. George Pemberton, & Robert J. Sharpe. (1988). Lower Cretaceous Example of a Shoreface-Attached Marine Bar Complex: The Wabiskaw ‘C’ Sand of Northeastern Alberta. 451–461. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ranger, Michael J., et al.. (1984). Lithostratigraphy of the Cambrian? – Lower Ordovician Bell Island and Wabana groups of Bell, Little Bell, and Kellys islands, Conception Bay, eastern Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 21(11). 1245–1261. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026