Michael J. Bishop

5.7k total citations
140 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Michael J. Bishop is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Bishop has authored 140 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 49 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 30 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Bishop's work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (42 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (24 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (19 papers). Michael J. Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (42 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (24 papers) and Tracheal and airway disorders (19 papers). Michael J. Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Taiwan. Michael J. Bishop's co-authors include Stuart A. McCluskey, Eun S. Kim, Richard M. Cooper, Frederick W. Cheney, Ernest A. Weymuller, Mary T. Hawn, G. Alec Rooke, Michael S. Benson, Timothy M. McCulloch and Robert W. McNutt and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Hepatology.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Bishop

134 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael J. Bishop United States 35 1.6k 1.4k 925 523 426 140 3.7k
Babu Naidu United Kingdom 31 1.9k 1.2× 507 0.4× 2.0k 2.1× 473 0.9× 316 0.7× 134 4.4k
François Harel Canada 40 863 0.5× 547 0.4× 1.1k 1.2× 237 0.5× 615 1.4× 149 4.8k
Richard I. Mazze United States 34 474 0.3× 1.5k 1.0× 972 1.1× 132 0.3× 241 0.6× 148 3.9k
Andrea Evangelista Italy 30 608 0.4× 234 0.2× 530 0.6× 431 0.8× 258 0.6× 114 2.4k
Jing You United States 29 355 0.2× 485 0.3× 1.1k 1.2× 238 0.5× 80 0.2× 101 2.4k
Marcin Wąsowicz Canada 30 354 0.2× 477 0.3× 673 0.7× 99 0.2× 431 1.0× 98 2.7k
Christian Stoppe Germany 31 597 0.4× 135 0.1× 713 0.8× 653 1.2× 368 0.9× 231 3.7k
Rudolph M. Navari United States 42 341 0.2× 392 0.3× 3.7k 4.0× 2.1k 3.9× 420 1.0× 164 5.7k
Fausto Roila Italy 45 980 0.6× 995 0.7× 4.5k 4.8× 2.0k 3.8× 302 0.7× 135 7.9k
Irvin Mayers Canada 28 1.2k 0.8× 77 0.1× 532 0.6× 1.2k 2.2× 220 0.5× 107 3.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Bishop. The network helps show where Michael J. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Bishop. Michael J. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bishop, Michael J., et al.. (2023). A safe-at-home benzoin condensation from imitation almond extract. Chemistry Teacher International. 5(3). 275–282. 1 indexed citations
2.
Chow, Edward Kai‐Hua, Lingling Fan, Xin Chen, & Michael J. Bishop. (2012). Oncogene-specific formation of chemoresistant murine hepatic cancer stem cells. Hepatology. 56(4). 1331–1341. 75 indexed citations
3.
Rubinsky, Anna D., Haili Sun, David K. Blough, et al.. (2012). AUDIT-C Alcohol Screening Results and Postoperative Inpatient Health Care Use. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 214(3). 296–305e1. 38 indexed citations
4.
Zhang, Cunyu, Susan M. Westaway, Jason D. Speake, et al.. (2010). Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as opioid receptor antagonists. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 21(2). 670–676. 7 indexed citations
6.
Bishop, Michael J., et al.. (2008). Factors Associated with Unanticipated Day of Surgery Deaths in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 107(6). 1924–1935. 22 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Richard M., et al.. (2005). Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patients. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 52(2). 191–198. 358 indexed citations
8.
Bishop, Michael J. & Björn M. Nilsson. (2003). New 5-HT2C receptor agonists. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents. 13(11). 1691–1705. 18 indexed citations
9.
Speake, Jason D., Frank Navas, Michael J. Bishop, et al.. (2003). 2-(Anilinomethyl)imidazolines as α1 adrenergic receptor agonists: α1a subtype selective 2′-heteroaryl compounds. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 13(6). 1183–1186. 15 indexed citations
10.
Bigham, Eric C., James A. Liacos, Frank Navas, et al.. (2002). α1-Adrenoceptor activation: A comparison of 4-(Anilinomethyl)imidazoles and 4-(Phenoxymethyl)imidazoles to related 2-imidazolines. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 12(23). 3449–3452. 4 indexed citations
11.
Bishop, Michael J., et al.. (2001). Recertification of respiratory therapists' intubation skills one year after initial training: an analysis of skill retention and retraining.. PubMed. 46(3). 234–7. 29 indexed citations
12.
Wakeley, James S., et al.. (2001). Akutan Harbor Project: Delineation of Wetlands on Akutan Island, Alaska. US Army Corps of Engineers: Engineer Research and Development Center (Knowledge Core). 99(10). 750–3. 1 indexed citations
13.
Bishop, Michael J., Judd Berman, Eric C. Bigham, et al.. (2001). 2-(Anilinomethyl)imidazolines as α1-adrenoceptor agonists: the identification of α1A subtype selective 2′-carboxylic acid esters and amides. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 11(21). 2871–2874. 5 indexed citations
14.
Deem, Steven, et al.. (1998). Red-Blood-Cell Augmentation of Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction: Hematocrit Dependence and the Importance of Nitric Oxide. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 157(4). 1181–1186. 67 indexed citations
15.
16.
Hussey, Joseph & Michael J. Bishop. (1996). Pressures Required to Move Gas Through the Native Airway in the Presence of a Fenestrated vs a Nonfenestrated Tracheostomy Tube. CHEST Journal. 110(2). 494–497. 27 indexed citations
17.
Kil, Hae Keum & Michael J. Bishop. (1994). Head Position and Oral vs Nasal Route as Factors Determiing Endotracheal Tube Resistance. CHEST Journal. 105(6). 1794–1797. 6 indexed citations
18.
Milgrom, Peter, et al.. (1992). Clinical study of diffusion hypoxia after nitrous oxide analgesia.. PubMed. 38(1). 21–3. 8 indexed citations
19.
Kemper, Kathi J., Michael S. Benson, & Michael J. Bishop. (1991). Predictors of postextubation stridor in pediatric trauma patients. Critical Care Medicine. 19(3). 352–355. 60 indexed citations
20.
Bishop, Michael J.. (1989). Mechanisms of Laryngotracheal Injury Following Prolonged Tracheal Intubation. CHEST Journal. 96(1). 185–186. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026