Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A taxonomy of cyber-harms: Defining the impacts of cyber-attacks and understanding how they propagate
2018172 citationsIoannis Agrafiotis, Jason R. C. Nurse et al.Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Goldsmith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Goldsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Goldsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Goldsmith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Goldsmith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Goldsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Goldsmith. The network helps show where Michael Goldsmith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Goldsmith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Goldsmith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Goldsmith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Goldsmith. Michael Goldsmith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Agrafiotis, Ioannis, et al.. (2018). Analysing trends and success factors of international cybersecurity capacity−building initiatives. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).1 indexed citations
Creese, Sadie, et al.. (2016). Reflecting on the Use of Sonification for Network Monitoring. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 254–261.5 indexed citations
8.
Goldsmith, Michael. (2015). The big smallness of Tuvalu. Global Environment. 8(1). 134–151.7 indexed citations
Bada, Maria, Sadie Creese, Michael Goldsmith, & Chris J. Mitchell. (2014). Improving the Effectiveness of CSIRTs. SSRN Electronic Journal. 53–58.1 indexed citations
11.
Bada, Maria, et al.. (2014). Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs): An Overview. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
Gibson−Robinson, Thomas & Michael Goldsmith. (2013). The Meaning and Implementation of SKIP in CSP. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 5–20.1 indexed citations
15.
Nurse, Jason R. C., et al.. (2012). An Initial Usability Evaluation of the Secure Situation Awareness System. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).4 indexed citations
16.
Papanikolaou, Nickolas, Sadie Creese, & Michael Goldsmith. (2011). Refinement checking for privacy policies. Science of Computer Programming. 77(10-11). 1198–1209.3 indexed citations
17.
Moffat, Nick & Michael Goldsmith. (2006). Assumption-Commitment Support for CSP Model Checking. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 104–119.1 indexed citations
18.
Goldsmith, Michael. (2005). Operational semantics for fun and profit. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).
19.
Ryan, Peter Y. A., Steve Schneider, Michael Goldsmith, Gavin Lowe, & Bill Roscoe. (2001). Modelling and analysis of security protocols. View.153 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.