Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gertz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gertz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gertz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gertz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gertz. The network helps show where Michael Gertz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Gertz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Gertz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Gertz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Gertz. Michael Gertz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schubert, Erich & Michael Gertz. (2018). Improving the Cluster Structure Extracted from OPTICS Plots.. 318–329.23 indexed citations
8.
Gertz, Michael, et al.. (2014). Vertex Similarity - A Basic Framework for Matching Geometric Graphs. LWA. 111–122.5 indexed citations
9.
Strötgen, Jannik, et al.. (2014). Extending HeidelTime for Temporal Expressions Referring to Historic Dates. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2390–2397.6 indexed citations
10.
Strötgen, Jannik, et al.. (2014). Computational Narratology: Extracting Tense Clusters from Narrative Texts. Language Resources and Evaluation. 950–955.7 indexed citations
11.
Strötgen, Jannik, et al.. (2013). HeidelTime: Tuning English and Developing Spanish Resources for TempEval-3. Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. 2. 15–19.28 indexed citations
12.
Karnstedt, Marcel, et al.. (2009). In-Network Detection of Anomaly Regions in Sensor Networks with Obstacles.. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 367–386.3 indexed citations
13.
Zinn, Daniel, et al.. (2007). Modeling and querying vague spatial objects using shapelets. Very Large Data Bases. 567–578.4 indexed citations
14.
Gertz, Michael & Quinn Hart. (2006). Geostreams: an online geospatial image database. PhDT.1 indexed citations
15.
Hart, Quinn & Michael Gertz. (2005). Querying streaming geospatial image data: the geostreams project. 147–150.6 indexed citations
16.
Hogarth, Michael, Michael Gertz, & Fredric A. Gorin. (2003). jTerm: an open source terminology server.. PubMed. 861–861.1 indexed citations
17.
Gertz, Michael, et al.. (2002). XQuery/IR: Integrating XML Document and Data Retrieval.. 1–6.23 indexed citations
18.
Gertz, Michael, et al.. (2001). Quixote: Building XML Repositories from Topic Specific Web Documents.. 103–108.3 indexed citations
19.
Gertz, Michael. (1997). Diagnosis and Repair of Constraint Violations in Database Systems.. 19. 96.4 indexed citations
20.
Lipeck, Udo W., Michael Gertz, & Gunter Saake. (1994). Transitional Monitoring of Dynamic Inegrity Constraints.. IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin. 17. 38–42.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.