Michael Feeney

3.3k total citations
9 papers, 62 citations indexed

About

Michael Feeney is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Feeney has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Instrumentation, 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in Michael Feeney's work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers). Michael Feeney is often cited by papers focused on CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers). Michael Feeney collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Michael Feeney's co-authors include R. Walters, C. Fremling, A. Dugas, Richard Dekany, Kevin B. Burdge, Jan van Roestel, Thomas A. Prince, Reed Riddle, Dmitry A. Duev and M. W. Coughlin and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters and Engineering Optimization.

In The Last Decade

Michael Feeney

9 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Feeney United States	5	42	13	11	10	9	9	62
S. Bongard France	5	63 1.5×	8 0.6×	6 0.5×	16 1.6×	11 1.2×	9	84
Gotthard Huster Germany	4	60 1.4×	22 1.7×	10 0.9×	8 0.8×	13 1.4×	9	74
B. Sánchez United States	5	37 0.9×	24 1.8×	7 0.6×	9 0.9×	13 1.4×	17	61
Torsten Boeker United States	6	51 1.2×	26 2.0×	11 1.0×	3 0.3×	11 1.2×	18	71
Dan Reiley United States	2	27 0.6×	15 1.2×	10 0.9×	5 0.5×	12 1.3×	2	41
I. Escudero Sanz Netherlands	4	43 1.0×	19 1.5×	12 1.1×	5 0.5×	14 1.6×	5	60
A. P. Rasmussen United States	3	38 0.9×	9 0.7×	25 2.3×	21 2.1×	10 1.1×	6	64
Gonzalo Saavedra Criado Netherlands	4	31 0.7×	15 1.2×	9 0.8×	4 0.4×	11 1.2×	6	52
U. Grözinger Germany	5	21 0.5×	13 1.0×	24 2.2×	4 0.4×	26 2.9×	18	48
Frederick Matsuda Japan	5	32 0.8×	8 0.6×	7 0.6×	5 0.5×	6 0.7×	17	44

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Feeney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Feeney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Feeney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Feeney. The network helps show where Michael Feeney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Feeney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Feeney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Feeney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Feeney. Michael Feeney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Coughlin, M. W., Kevin B. Burdge, E. S. Phinney, et al.. (2020). ZTF J1901+5309: a 40.6-min orbital period eclipsing double white dwarf system. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 494(1). L91–L96. 18 indexed citations

2.

Rigault, M., James D. Neill, N. Blagorodnova, et al.. (2019). Fully automated integral field spectrograph pipeline for the SEDMachine: pysedm. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 15 indexed citations

3.

Coughlin, M. W., Richard Dekany, Dmitry A. Duev, et al.. (2019). The Kitt Peak Electron Multiplying CCD demonstrator. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 485(1). 1412–1419. 9 indexed citations

4.

Dekany, Richard, et al.. (2017). Optical design of the Zwicky Transient Facility: a major upgrade to the 48” Schmidt Camera at Palomar Observatory. 52–52. 2 indexed citations

5.

Dekany, Richard, et al.. (2017). Optical Design of the Zwicky Transient Facility: A Major Upgrade to the 48” Schmidt Camera at Palomar Observatory. ITh1B.6–ITh1B.6. 1 indexed citations

6.

Dekany, Richard G., Roger M. Smith, Justin Belicki, et al.. (2016). The Zwicky Transient Facility Camera. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9908. 99085M–99085M. 8 indexed citations

7.

Inoue, Hisashi, et al.. (2013). XRF analysis of high gain-on-ignition samples by fusion method using fundamental-parameter method. Powder Diffraction. 28(2). 132–136. 4 indexed citations

8.

Homma, Hisashi, et al.. (2012). STRATEGY OF FUSION BEAD CORRECTION IN XRF ANALYSIS OF POWDERS. 1 indexed citations

9.

Bradley, John, Leslie H. Brown, & Michael Feeney. (1974). COST OPTIMIZATION IN RELATION TO FACTORY STRUCTURES. Engineering Optimization. 1(2). 125–138. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact