Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis
19992.3k citationsMichael E. Tipping, Chris BishopJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)profile →
Mixtures of Probabilistic Principal Component Analyzers
19991.2k citationsMichael E. Tipping, Chris Bishopprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Tipping
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Tipping's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Tipping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Tipping more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Tipping
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Tipping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Tipping. The network helps show where Michael E. Tipping may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael E. Tipping
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael E. Tipping.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael E. Tipping based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael E. Tipping. Michael E. Tipping is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Petropoulos, Fotios, et al.. (2021). Understanding forecast reconciliation. European Journal of Operational Research. 294(1). 149–160.49 indexed citations
Lawrence, Neil D. & Michael E. Tipping. (2003). Generalised Component Analysis.2 indexed citations
7.
Bishop, Chris & Michael E. Tipping. (2003). Bayesian Regression and Classification. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh). 190. 267–285.91 indexed citations
Tipping, Michael E. & Chris Bishop. (2002). Bayesian Image Super-Resolution. Neural Information Processing Systems. 15. 1303–1310.149 indexed citations
Tipping, Michael E. & Bernhard Schölkopf. (2001). A kernel approach for vector quantization with guaranteed distortion bounds. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 129–129.21 indexed citations
12.
Tipping, Michael E.. (2000). Sparse Kernel Principal Component Analysis. Neural Information Processing Systems. 13. 633–639.91 indexed citations
Tipping, Michael E. & Chris Bishop. (1999). Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology). 61(3). 611–622.2266 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Tipping, Michael E.. (1998). Probabilistic Visualisation of High-Dimensional Binary Data. Neural Information Processing Systems. 11. 592–598.40 indexed citations
16.
Tipping, Michael E. & David Lowe. (1998). Shadow targets. Neurocomputing. 19(1-3). 211–222.28 indexed citations
Lowe, David & Michael E. Tipping. (1996). NeuroScale: Novel Topographic Feature Extraction using RBF Networks. Neural Information Processing Systems. 9. 543–549.34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.