Michael E. Reimer

3.1k total citations
83 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Michael E. Reimer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael E. Reimer has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 53 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 25 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Michael E. Reimer's work include Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (36 papers), Optical Network Technologies (28 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (25 papers). Michael E. Reimer is often cited by papers focused on Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (36 papers), Optical Network Technologies (28 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (25 papers). Michael E. Reimer collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and United States. Michael E. Reimer's co-authors include Philip J. Poole, Dan Dalacu, Gabriele Bulgarini, Erik P. A. M. Bakkers, Val Zwiller, Klaus D. Jöns, Val Zwiller, Moïra Hocevar, Leo P. Kouwenhoven and Andreas Fognini and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Nano Letters.

In The Last Decade

Michael E. Reimer

78 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael E. Reimer Canada 23 1.5k 1.3k 798 545 389 83 2.1k
Tobias Heindel Germany 29 1.8k 1.2× 1.3k 1.0× 472 0.6× 957 1.8× 423 1.1× 67 2.3k
Klaus D. Jöns Germany 31 2.3k 1.5× 1.8k 1.3× 618 0.8× 1.4k 2.5× 650 1.7× 62 3.2k
L. Lanco France 26 2.3k 1.5× 1.4k 1.0× 396 0.5× 1.4k 2.5× 284 0.7× 57 2.7k
C. Antón Spain 20 1.5k 1.0× 793 0.6× 342 0.4× 886 1.6× 331 0.9× 48 1.9k
P. See United Kingdom 23 1.6k 1.0× 1.0k 0.8× 190 0.2× 475 0.9× 342 0.9× 85 1.8k
Xing Ding China 13 1.8k 1.2× 1.3k 1.0× 350 0.4× 1.6k 2.9× 816 2.1× 25 3.0k
Simone Luca Portalupi Germany 29 2.2k 1.5× 1.8k 1.3× 562 0.7× 1.1k 2.1× 457 1.2× 78 2.8k
Matthew T. Rakher United States 18 1.8k 1.2× 1.1k 0.8× 252 0.3× 798 1.5× 166 0.4× 33 1.9k
Daniele Bajoni Italy 29 2.1k 1.4× 1.2k 0.9× 701 0.9× 770 1.4× 190 0.5× 94 2.7k
K. Hennessy United States 18 3.4k 2.3× 2.5k 1.9× 890 1.1× 1.0k 1.9× 361 0.9× 27 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Reimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Reimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Reimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Reimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Reimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Reimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Reimer. The network helps show where Michael E. Reimer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael E. Reimer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael E. Reimer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael E. Reimer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael E. Reimer. Michael E. Reimer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tam, Man Chun, et al.. (2025). Near-Unity Absorption in Semiconductor Metasurfaces Using Kerker Interference. Nano Letters. 25(23). 9362–9368. 1 indexed citations
2.
Anderson, Paul, Jiawei Qiu, Mohd Zeeshan, et al.. (2025). Reversible Tuning of Nanowire Quantum Dot to Atomic Transitions. ACS Photonics. 12(9). 4939–4949.
3.
Zeeshan, Mohd, Philip J. Poole, Dan Dalacu, et al.. (2024). Oscillating photonic Bell state from a semiconductor quantum dot for quantum key distribution. Communications Physics. 7(1). 8 indexed citations
4.
Yang, Bowen, Tarun Patel, Kostyantyn Pichugin, et al.. (2024). Macroscopic tunneling probe of Moiré spin textures in twisted CrI3. Nature Communications. 15(1). 4982–4982. 10 indexed citations
5.
Sfigakis, F., Ho-Sung Kim, Man Chun Tam, et al.. (2023). Stable electroluminescence in ambipolar dopant-free lateral p–n junctions. Applied Physics Letters. 123(6).
6.
Gibson, S. J., Yingchao Cui, Dick van Dam, et al.. (2019). Tapered InP nanowire arrays for efficient broadband high-speed single-photon detection. Nature Nanotechnology. 14(5). 473–479. 86 indexed citations
7.
Elshaari, Ali W., Iman Esmaeil Zadeh, Andreas Fognini, et al.. (2017). On-chip single photon filtering and multiplexing in hybrid quantum photonic circuits. Nature Communications. 8(1). 379–379. 135 indexed citations
8.
O’Sullivan, Maurice, Michael E. Reimer, & Michel Bélanger. (2016). Nascent Line-side Modem Solutions for High Capacity Optical Networks. Optical Fiber Communication Conference. M2J.1–M2J.1. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cartledge, John C., A.D. Ellis, Andrew D. Shiner, et al.. (2016). Signal Processing Techniques for Reducing the Impact of Fiber Nonlinearities on System Performance. Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Th4F.5–Th4F.5. 5 indexed citations
10.
Versteegh, Marijn A. M., Michael E. Reimer, Klaus D. Jöns, et al.. (2014). Polarization-entangled photon pairs from a nanowire quantum dot. arXiv (Cornell University).
11.
Lagoudakis, Konstantinos G., Peter L. McMahon, Shruti Puri, et al.. (2014). Demonstration of weak optical pumping of a spin qubit in a site-controlled nanowire quantum dot. arXiv (Cornell University).
12.
Zhuge, Qunbi, et al.. (2014). Aggressive Quantization on Perturbation Coefficients for Nonlinear Pre-Distortion. Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Th4D.7–Th4D.7. 19 indexed citations
13.
Bulgarini, Gabriele, Michael E. Reimer, Moïra Hocevar, et al.. (2012). Spontaneous emission control of single quantum dots in bottom-up nanowire waveguides. Applied Physics Letters. 100(12). 66 indexed citations
14.
Tartakovskii, A. I., C. Schneider, Michael E. Reimer, et al.. (2012). Quantum Dots. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 32 indexed citations
15.
Reimer, Michael E., et al.. (2011). Electric Field Induced Removal of the Biexciton Binding Energy in a Single Quantum Dot. Nano Letters. 11(2). 645–650. 41 indexed citations
16.
Soliman, George, Michael E. Reimer, & David Yevick. (2010). Measurement and simulation of polarization transients in dispersion compensation modules. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 27(12). 2532–2532. 6 indexed citations
17.
Akopian, N., Erik P. A. M. Bakkers, Jean‐Christophe Harmand, et al.. (2010). Nanowires for quantum optics. 1–5. 1 indexed citations
18.
Kim, Daniel, Weidong Sheng, Philip J. Poole, et al.. (2009). Tuning the excitongfactor in single InAs/InP quantum dots. Physical Review B. 79(4). 22 indexed citations
19.
Yevick, David, Michael E. Reimer, & Maurice O’Sullivan. (2009). Simplified transition matrix analysis of the hinge model. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 26(3). 710–710. 1 indexed citations
20.
Lű, Tao, Maurice O’Sullivan, Michael E. Reimer, Weihong Huang, & David Yevick. (2005). Multicanonical comparison of polarization-mode dispersion compensator performance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 22(12). 2804–2804. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026