Michael E. Purucker

5.6k total citations
80 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Michael E. Purucker is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael E. Purucker has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 47 papers in Molecular Biology and 20 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Michael E. Purucker's work include Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (47 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (42 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (39 papers). Michael E. Purucker is often cited by papers focused on Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (47 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (42 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (39 papers). Michael E. Purucker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Michael E. Purucker's co-authors include Nils Olsen, Terence J. Sabaka, Sean C. Solomon, B. J. Anderson, H. Korth, J. A. Slavin, C. L. Johnson, B. Langlais, Mioara Mandéa and R. M. Winslow and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

In The Last Decade

Michael E. Purucker

79 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael E. Purucker United States 36 2.5k 1.9k 1.1k 787 285 80 3.9k
B. G. Bills United States 37 2.8k 1.1× 573 0.3× 1.0k 1.0× 1.5k 1.9× 835 2.9× 177 4.2k
Andrew Jackson Switzerland 28 905 0.4× 2.5k 1.3× 1.5k 1.4× 1.3k 1.7× 1000 3.5× 109 3.5k
C. L. Johnson United States 43 4.2k 1.7× 2.5k 1.3× 1.9k 1.7× 2.2k 2.8× 205 0.7× 214 6.0k
R. Holme United Kingdom 29 705 0.3× 2.1k 1.1× 1.3k 1.2× 1.2k 1.6× 591 2.1× 71 2.6k
C. A. Raymond United States 43 5.8k 2.3× 448 0.2× 1.5k 1.4× 1.7k 2.1× 115 0.4× 399 6.7k
E. M. Parmentier United States 53 2.7k 1.1× 477 0.2× 5.5k 5.1× 1.3k 1.7× 136 0.5× 195 7.8k
P. J. Wasilewski United States 28 2.9k 1.2× 2.0k 1.0× 1.2k 1.1× 741 0.9× 72 0.3× 98 4.2k
D. W. Strangway Canada 32 1.2k 0.5× 1.5k 0.8× 1.7k 1.6× 673 0.9× 170 0.6× 144 3.2k
C. P. Sonett United States 38 3.8k 1.5× 1.7k 0.9× 480 0.4× 609 0.8× 267 0.9× 170 4.5k
Tilman Spohn Germany 47 5.0k 2.0× 1.1k 0.6× 2.2k 2.0× 1.2k 1.5× 165 0.6× 208 6.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Purucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Purucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Purucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Purucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Purucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Purucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Purucker. The network helps show where Michael E. Purucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael E. Purucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael E. Purucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael E. Purucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael E. Purucker. Michael E. Purucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Olsen, Nils, D. Ravat, & Michael E. Purucker. (2023). On the determination and interpretation of the lithospheric induced magnetisation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 606. 118038–118038. 1 indexed citations
2.
Langlais, B., et al.. (2019). A New Model of the Crustal Magnetic Field of Mars Using MGS and MAVEN. Journal of Geophysical Research Planets. 124(6). 1542–1569. 98 indexed citations
3.
McEnroe, S. A., Peter Robinson, Nathan Church, & Michael E. Purucker. (2018). Magnetism at Depth: A View from an Ancient Continental Subduction and Collision Zone. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems. 19(4). 1123–1147. 14 indexed citations
4.
Philpott, L., C. L. Johnson, R. M. Winslow, et al.. (2014). Constraints on the secular variation of Mercury's magnetic field from the combined analysis of MESSENGER and Mariner 10 data. Geophysical Research Letters. 41(19). 6627–6634. 17 indexed citations
5.
Winslow, R. M., B. J. Anderson, C. L. Johnson, et al.. (2012). Mercury's magnetopause and bow shock from MESSENGER observations. AGUFM. 2012. 7 indexed citations
6.
Anderson, B. J., C. L. Johnson, J. A. Slavin, et al.. (2011). Mercury's magnetopause and bow shock from MESSENGER observations. 2011. 674. 1 indexed citations
7.
Purucker, Michael E., et al.. (2011). Mycobacterium chimaera causes tuberculosis‐like infection in a male patient with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 45(3). 450–452. 12 indexed citations
8.
Halekas, J. S., et al.. (2009). Interpreting Lunar Impact Demagnetization Signatures Using Lunar Prospector Magnetometer/Electron Reflectometer Data. 1354. 1 indexed citations
9.
Halekas, J. S., et al.. (2009). How strong are lunar crustal magnetic fields at the surface? Considerations from a reexamination of the electron reflectometry technique. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009. 2 indexed citations
10.
Rajaram, Mita, S. P. Anand, K. Hemant, & Michael E. Purucker. (2009). Curie isotherm map of Indian subcontinent from satellite and aeromagnetic data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 281(3-4). 147–158. 80 indexed citations
11.
Benna, M., B. J. Anderson, D. N. Baker, et al.. (2009). Modeling of the magnetosphere of Mercury at the time of the first MESSENGER flyby. Icarus. 209(1). 3–10. 57 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, B. J., M. H. Acuña, H. Korth, et al.. (2008). The Structure of Mercury's Magnetic Field from MESSENGER's First Flyby. Science. 321(5885). 82–85. 140 indexed citations
13.
Purucker, Michael E., et al.. (2007). Lunar South Pole Hydrogen & Water Ice Deposits: Constraints from Lunar Prospector Magnetic Field Observations. LPI. 1034. 1 indexed citations
14.
Maule, Cathrine Fox, Michael E. Purucker, Nils Olsen, & Klaus Mosegaard. (2005). Heat Flux Anomalies in Antarctica Revealed by Satellite Magnetic Data. Science. 309(5733). 464–467. 261 indexed citations
15.
Whaler, Kathy & Michael E. Purucker. (2003). Martian magnetization—preliminary models. The Leading Edge. 22(8). 763–765. 4 indexed citations
16.
Ravat, D., Kathy Whaler, Mark Pilkington, Terence J. Sabaka, & Michael E. Purucker. (2002). Compatibility of high-altitude aeromagnetic and satellite-altitude magnetic anomalies over Canada. Geophysics. 67(2). 546–554. 35 indexed citations
17.
Purucker, Michael E., B. Langlais, & Mioara Mandéa. (2001). Interpretation of a Magnetic Map of the Valles Marineris Region, Mars. 1865. 3 indexed citations
18.
Purucker, Michael E. & Douglas S. Clark. (2000). Exploration geophysics on Mars: Lessons from magnetics. The Leading Edge. 19(5). 484–487. 4 indexed citations
19.
Purucker, Michael E., D. Ravat, Herbert Frey, et al.. (2000). An altitude‐normalized magnetic map of Mars and its interpretation. Geophysical Research Letters. 27(16). 2449–2452. 144 indexed citations
20.
Ravat, D. & Michael E. Purucker. (1999). The future of satellite magnetic anomaly studies is bright!. The Leading Edge. 18(3). 326–329. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. G. Bills Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Jackson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. L. Johnson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Holme Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. A. Raymond Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. M. Parmentier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. J. Wasilewski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. W. Strangway Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. P. Sonett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tilman Spohn
Rankless by CCL
2026