Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Carleton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Carleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Carleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Carleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Carleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Carleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Carleton. The network helps show where Michael D. Carleton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael D. Carleton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael D. Carleton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael D. Carleton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael D. Carleton. Michael D. Carleton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
O’Brien, Charles W., et al.. (2006). Terrestrial Small Mammals (Soricidae and Muridae) from the Gamba Complex in Gabon: Species Composition and Comparison of Sampling Tecnhiques. Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution).4 indexed citations
Carleton, Michael D., Robert D. Fisher, & Alfred L. Gardner. (1999). Identification and distribution of cotton rats, genus Sigmodon (Muridae: Sigmodontinae), of Nayarit, M?xico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 112(4). 813–856.16 indexed citations
9.
Musser, Guy G., Michael D. Carleton, & Alfred L. Gardner. (1998). Systematic studies of Oryzomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae): diagnoses and distributions of species formerly assigned to Oryzomys 'capito'. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History.133 indexed citations
Carleton, Michael D.. (1994). Systematic studies of Madagascar's endemic rodents (Muroidea: Nesomyinae): revision of the genus Eliurus. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).24 indexed citations
12.
Voss, Robert S. & Michael D. Carleton. (1993). A new genus for Hesperomys molitor Winge and Holochilus magnus Hershkovitz (Mammalia, Muridae) with an analysis of its phylogenetic relationships. American Museum Novitates. 3085. 1–39.86 indexed citations
13.
Voss, Robert S. & Michael D. Carleton. (1993). A new genus for Hesperomys molitor Winge and Holochilus magnus Hershkovitz (Mammalia, Muridae) : with an analysis of its phylogenetic relationships. American Museum novitates ; no. 3085. American Museum Novitates.1 indexed citations
Carleton, Michael D., et al.. (1981). The species of Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) in Paraguay and the identity of Azara's. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).5 indexed citations
17.
Carleton, Michael D., et al.. (1979). A Synopsis of Fossil Grasshopper Mice, Genus Onychomys, and their Relationships to Recent Species Claude W. Hibbard Memorial Volume VII. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).8 indexed citations
18.
Carleton, Michael D.. (1977). Interrelationships of populations of the Peromyscus boylii species group (Rodentia, Muridae) in western Mexico. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).24 indexed citations
19.
Hooper, E. T. & Michael D. Carleton. (1976). Reproduction, Growth and Development in Two Contiguously Allopatric Rodent Species, Genus Scotinomys. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 151. 1–52.41 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.