Michael C. Grant

3.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
34 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Michael C. Grant is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael C. Grant has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Michael C. Grant's work include Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers). Michael C. Grant is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers). Michael C. Grant collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Colombia. Michael C. Grant's co-authors include Yan B. Linhart, Jeffry B. Mitton, Ryckie G. Wade, Luke Geoghegan, Emily L. Clarke, Marc Arbyn, Luke A. McGuinness, Janis Antonovics, Vernon W. Proctor and Steven K. Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Michael C. Grant

31 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF LOCAL GENETIC DIFFERENTIATIO... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 2020 250 500 750 1000

Peers

Michael C. Grant
Steven M. White United Kingdom
Rhondda Jones Australia
Laura Jones United States
Mark A. Newell United Kingdom
David Rowell Australia
Michael R. Gray Australia
Michael C. Grant
Citations per year, relative to Michael C. Grant Michael C. Grant (= 1×) peers Ismaïl Ahmed

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Grant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Grant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Grant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Grant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Grant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Grant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Grant. The network helps show where Michael C. Grant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael C. Grant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael C. Grant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael C. Grant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael C. Grant. Michael C. Grant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Haut, Elliott R., Marvin Borja, Michael C. Grant, et al.. (2025). Association of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Implementation and Comparative Outcomes Improvement at an Academic Medical Center. World Journal of Surgery. 50(1). 35–44.
2.
Dunn, Lauren K., Michael C. Grant, & Tong J. Gan. (2025). Is There Still a Role For Neuraxial Analgesia in Cancer Surgery?. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 140(4). 795–797.
3.
Grant, Michael C., Charles S. Brudney, Jaime Hernández-Montfort, et al.. (2025). Definitions of Cardiogenic Shock and Indications for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Joint Consensus Report of the PeriOperative Quality Initiative and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 120(2). 202–212. 2 indexed citations
4.
Salenger, Rawn, Niv Ad, Michael C. Grant, et al.. (2024). Maximizing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Enhanced Recovery (ERAS). Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 19(4). 371–379. 1 indexed citations
5.
Zorrilla‐Vaca, Andrés, Jimmy J. Arévalo, & Michael C. Grant. (2024). Protective mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients after surgery. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 30(6). 679–683. 1 indexed citations
6.
Zorrilla‐Vaca, Andrés, et al.. (2023). Postoperative Hypoxemia After Dual-Controlled vs Volume-Controlled Ventilation in Lung Surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 116(1). 173–179. 4 indexed citations
7.
Zorrilla‐Vaca, Andrés, et al.. (2023). Performance Comparison of Pulmonary Risk Scoring Systems in Lung Resection. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 37(9). 1734–1743. 6 indexed citations
8.
Zorrilla‐Vaca, Andrés, et al.. (2023). Dexmedetomidine improves pulmonary outcomes in thoracic surgery under one-lung ventilation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 93. 111345–111345. 7 indexed citations
9.
Zorrilla‐Vaca, Andrés, Michael C. Grant, Richard D. Urman, & György Frendl. (2022). Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 129(5). 815–825. 20 indexed citations
10.
Yoshimura, Ryo, Michael C. Grant, Matthew D. Gardiner, & Ryckie G. Wade. (2021). Disseminating Hand Surgery Research Using Social Media: The Relationship Between Altmetrics and Citations. The Journal Of Hand Surgery. 46(9). 740–747. 13 indexed citations
11.
Stone, Alexander B., et al.. (2021). The monthly operating cost of an institutional COVID-19 airway response team: A financial model and sensitivity analysis based on experience at an academic medical center. Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management. 23. 100168–100168. 2 indexed citations
12.
Grant, Michael C., Luke Geoghegan, Marc Arbyn, et al.. (2020). The prevalence of symptoms in 24,410 adults infected by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 148 studies from 9 countries. PLoS ONE. 15(6). e0234765–e0234765. 431 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
14.
Schmidt, Steven K., et al.. (2006). Biogeography and Landscape-Scale Diversity of the Dominant Crenarchaeota of Soil. Microbial Ecology. 52(3). 480–490. 46 indexed citations
15.
Mitton, Jeffry B., et al.. (2000). POPULATION AND SUBSPECIFIC GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN THE FOXTAIL PINE (PINUS BALFOURIANA). Evolution. 54(5). 1813–1819. 31 indexed citations
16.
Robertson, D. S. & Michael C. Grant. (1996). Feedback and chaos in Darwinian evolution Part II. Numerical modeling. Complexity. 2(2). 18–30. 2 indexed citations
17.
Robertson, D. S. & Michael C. Grant. (1996). Feedback and chaos in Darwinian evolution:Part I. Theoretical considerations. Complexity. 2(1). 10–14. 5 indexed citations
18.
Grant, Michael C., et al.. (1994). Darwin, dogs and DNA: Freshman writing about biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 3(4). 259–262. 2 indexed citations
19.
Grant, Michael C. & Vernon W. Proctor. (1980). ELECTROPHORETIC ANALYSIS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN THE CHAROPHYTA. I. GENE DUPLICATION VIA POLYPLOIDY1. Journal of Phycology. 16(1). 109–115. 17 indexed citations
20.
Grant, Michael C. & Janis Antonovics. (1978). Biology of Ecologically Marginal Populations of Anthoxanthum odoratum. I. Phenetics and Dynamics. Evolution. 32(4). 822–822. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026