Michael Bracher

2.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
53 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Michael Bracher is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Bracher has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 11 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Michael Bracher's work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers). Michael Bracher is often cited by papers focused on Organ Donation and Transplantation (8 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (7 papers). Michael Bracher collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Michael Bracher's co-authors include Gigi Santow, Carl May, Tim Rapley, Christine May, Elizabeth Murray, Frances S Mair, Tracy Finch, Melissa Girling, Michelle Myall and Amanda Cummings and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Epidemiology and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Michael Bracher

46 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 2022 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Bracher United Kingdom 19 557 321 292 277 242 53 1.4k
Lynda Clarke United Kingdom 18 525 0.9× 373 1.2× 296 1.0× 216 0.8× 172 0.7× 47 1.3k
Inge Hutter Netherlands 19 305 0.5× 258 0.8× 127 0.4× 134 0.5× 118 0.5× 56 970
Mark R. Emerson United States 22 660 1.2× 225 0.7× 171 0.6× 132 0.5× 435 1.8× 35 1.6k
Piroska Östlin Sweden 21 924 1.7× 202 0.6× 70 0.2× 197 0.7× 316 1.3× 35 1.7k
Claudia Moreno United States 14 592 1.1× 584 1.8× 70 0.2× 316 1.1× 214 0.9× 27 1.7k
Faujdar Ram India 23 566 1.0× 188 0.6× 178 0.6× 462 1.7× 187 0.8× 62 1.7k
Tazeen Saeed Ali Pakistan 21 383 0.7× 244 0.8× 94 0.3× 202 0.7× 308 1.3× 124 1.7k
Kenneth Hill United States 22 680 1.2× 193 0.6× 175 0.6× 151 0.5× 133 0.5× 47 2.2k
Nicky Hudson United Kingdom 25 352 0.6× 206 0.6× 185 0.6× 264 1.0× 719 3.0× 98 2.4k
Tyson H. Brown United States 22 952 1.7× 927 2.9× 226 0.8× 190 0.7× 179 0.7× 49 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bracher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bracher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bracher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bracher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bracher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bracher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bracher. The network helps show where Michael Bracher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Bracher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Bracher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Bracher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Bracher. Michael Bracher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, et al.. (2023). Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(20). 1–159.
2.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, Michelle Myall, Christina Faull, et al.. (2023). Eye donation in hospice and hospital palliative care settings: perceptions, practice, and service development needs – findings from a national survey. BMC Palliative Care. 22(1). 173–173.
3.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, et al.. (2022). 10 Eye donation in palliative and hospice care settings: patient views and missed opportunities!. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(Suppl 2). A4.3–A5.
4.
May, Carl, Bianca Albers, Michael Bracher, et al.. (2022). Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development. Implementation Science. 17(1). 19–19. 104 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, Adam Hurlow, Christina Faull, et al.. (2022). The potential for eye donation from hospice and palliative care clinical settings in England: a retrospective case note review of deceased patients' records. Cell and Tissue Banking. 24(2). 341–349. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bracher, Michael, Geoffrey J. Pilkington, & Karen Pilkington. (2021). Systematic Reviews and Quality Appraisal ofIn VitroCancer Studies: Investigation of Current Practice. Anticancer Research. 41(11). 5377–5391. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bracher, Michael, et al.. (2021). Barriers and Facilitators to Eye Donation in Hospice and Palliative Care Settings: A Scoping Review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 175–187. 4 indexed citations
9.
Bracher, Michael, Geoffrey J. Pilkington, C. Oliver Hanemann, & Karen Pilkington. (2020). A Systematic Approach to Review of in vitro Methods in Brain Tumour Research (SAToRI-BTR): Development of a Preliminary Checklist for Evaluating Quality and Human Relevance. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 8. 936–936. 3 indexed citations
10.
Bracher, Michael & Carl May. (2019). Implementing and Embedding Health Informatics Systems – Understanding Organizational Behaviour Change Using Normalization Process Theory (NPT). Studies in health technology and informatics. 263. 171–190. 10 indexed citations
14.
Bracher, Michael, Jessica Corner, & Richard Wagland. (2016). Exploring experiences of cancer care in Wales: a thematic analysis of free-text responses to the 2013 Wales Cancer Patient Experience Survey (WCPES). BMJ Open. 6(9). e011830–e011830. 18 indexed citations
15.
Santow, Gigi, Michael Bracher, & Susan Watkins. (2008). Implications for behavioural change in rural Malawi of popular understandings of the epidemiology of AIDS. 6 indexed citations
16.
Bracher, Michael, Gigi Santow, & Susan Watkins. (2004). Assessing the Potential of Condom Use to Prevent the Spread of HIV: A Microsimulation Study. Studies in Family Planning. 35(1). 48–64. 35 indexed citations
17.
Nakiyingi, Jessica, Michael Bracher, James Whitworth, et al.. (2003). Child survival in relation to mother's HIV infection and survival. AIDS. 17(12). 1827–1834. 79 indexed citations
18.
Santow, Gigi & Michael Bracher. (1994). RE: “LONG-TERM RISK OF HYSTERECTOMY AMONG 80,007 STERILIZED AND COMPARISON WOMEN AT KAISER PERMANENTE, 1971–1987”. American Journal of Epidemiology. 140(7). 661–661. 1 indexed citations
19.
Santow, Gigi & Michael Bracher. (1992). Correlates of hysterectomy in Australia. Social Science & Medicine. 34(8). 929–942. 53 indexed citations
20.
Bracher, Michael & Gigi Santow. (1981). Some methodological considerations in the analysis of current status data. Population Studies. 35(5). 425–437. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026