Michael Boppr�

845 total citations
8 papers, 653 citations indexed

About

Michael Boppr� is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Boppr� has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 653 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Michael Boppr�'s work include Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (6 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). Michael Boppr� is often cited by papers focused on Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (6 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). Michael Boppr� collaborates with scholars based in Germany and United States. Michael Boppr�'s co-authors include Dietrich Schneider, J. Boeckh, Franz X. Bogner, Klaus-Dieter Ernst, Robert L. Petty, Jerrold Meinwald and William R. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Chemical Ecology, Journal of Comparative Physiology A and Die Naturwissenschaften.

In The Last Decade

Michael Boppr�

8 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Boppr� Germany	7	455	294	255	249	151	8	653
Hélène de Vos Netherlands	11	450 1.0×	233 0.8×	200 0.8×	224 0.9×	172 1.1×	14	658
Thomas E. Pliske United States	14	557 1.2×	222 0.8×	181 0.7×	226 0.9×	269 1.8×	15	666
Sylvie Derridj France	13	187 0.4×	239 0.8×	330 1.3×	393 1.6×	126 0.8×	27	692
P. D. East Australia	18	178 0.4×	292 1.0×	156 0.6×	388 1.6×	262 1.7×	25	768
Chuan Ma China	16	421 0.9×	352 1.2×	126 0.5×	418 1.7×	441 2.9×	40	880
Nikola Tucić Serbia	16	279 0.6×	150 0.5×	202 0.8×	354 1.4×	296 2.0×	46	691
M. Kehat Israel	20	306 0.7×	311 1.1×	391 1.5×	1.0k 4.2×	324 2.1×	75	1.3k
Matilde Eizaguirre Spain	19	159 0.3×	463 1.6×	405 1.6×	635 2.6×	170 1.1×	62	954
Kelsey J.R.P. Byers United Kingdom	13	337 0.7×	516 1.8×	226 0.9×	122 0.5×	158 1.0×	19	796
Leónidas Tsacas France	16	385 0.8×	169 0.6×	222 0.9×	451 1.8×	409 2.7×	70	837

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Boppr�

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Boppr�'s research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Boppr� with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Boppr� more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Boppr�

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Boppr�. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Boppr�. The network helps show where Michael Boppr� may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Boppr�

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Boppr�. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Boppr� based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Boppr�. Michael Boppr� is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Boppr�, Michael. (2003). Roland Mecke, Insects of the Brazilian Pine. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 38(2). 155–155. 1 indexed citations

2.

Boppr�, Michael. (1990). Lepidoptera and pyrrolizidine alkaloids Exemplification of complexity in chemical ecology. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 16(1). 165–185. 157 indexed citations

3.

Boppr�, Michael. (1986). Insects pharmacophagously utilizing defensive plant chemicals (Pyrrolizidine alkaloids). Die Naturwissenschaften. 73(1). 17–26. 161 indexed citations

4.

Bogner, Franz X., Michael Boppr�, Klaus-Dieter Ernst, & J. Boeckh. (1986). CO2 sensitive receptors on labial palps ofRhodogastria moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae): physiology, fine structure and central projection. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 158(6). 741–749. 96 indexed citations

5.

Boppr�, Michael & Dietrich Schneider. (1985). Pyrrolizidine alkaloids quantitatively regulate both scent organ morphogenesis and pheromone biosynthesis in maleCreatonotos moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 157(5). 569–577. 39 indexed citations

6.

Boppr�, Michael. (1984). Redefining ?Pharmacophagy?. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 10(7). 1151–1154. 83 indexed citations

7.

Boppr�, Michael, Robert L. Petty, Dietrich Schneider, & Jerrold Meinwald. (1978). Behaviorally mediated contacts between scent organs: Another prerequisite for pheromone production inDanaus chrysippus males (lepidoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 126(2). 97–103. 33 indexed citations

8.

Schneider, Dietrich, et al.. (1975). A pheromone precursor and its uptake in maleDanaus butterflies. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 97(3). 245–256. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact