Michael Book

482 total citations
8 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Michael Book is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Book has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 4 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Michael Book's work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (2 papers). Michael Book is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (4 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (2 papers). Michael Book collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Michael Book's co-authors include Yiru Guo, Roberto Bolli, Yibing Nong, Kyung U. Hong, Junjie Du, Qianhong Li, Xiaoping Zhu, Aruni Bhatnagar, Pengxiao Cao and Xiaoping Zhu and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, PLoS ONE and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Michael Book

8 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Book United States 8 217 203 113 102 62 8 363
Chuanjiang Lu Japan 8 131 0.6× 144 0.7× 114 1.0× 160 1.6× 78 1.3× 9 364
Saranya Purushothaman Italy 4 223 1.0× 221 1.1× 67 0.6× 261 2.6× 45 0.7× 5 483
Neel K. Kapasi United States 4 148 0.7× 140 0.7× 71 0.6× 172 1.7× 44 0.7× 6 371
Mohammed Qayyum United States 5 105 0.5× 138 0.7× 127 1.1× 106 1.0× 37 0.6× 13 332
Junjie Du United States 5 152 0.7× 137 0.7× 69 0.6× 59 0.6× 42 0.7× 7 237
Gregory N. Hunt United States 6 137 0.6× 135 0.7× 90 0.8× 62 0.6× 39 0.6× 8 224
Joon Sup Lee United States 4 221 1.0× 222 1.1× 146 1.3× 141 1.4× 25 0.4× 5 455
Julius B. Elmore United States 5 209 1.0× 280 1.4× 122 1.1× 78 0.8× 18 0.3× 6 390
Yue-Jin Yang China 6 101 0.5× 116 0.6× 102 0.9× 116 1.1× 47 0.8× 9 301
Heather Stowers United States 8 210 1.0× 225 1.1× 133 1.2× 112 1.1× 32 0.5× 12 365

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Book

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Book's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Book with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Book more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Book

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Book. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Book. The network helps show where Michael Book may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Book

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Book. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Book based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Book. Michael Book is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Guo, Yiru, Yibing Nong, Deepali Tukaye, et al.. (2019). Inducible cardiac-specific overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) confers resistance to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Basic Research in Cardiology. 114(5). 32–32. 19 indexed citations
2.
Wysoczynski, Marcin, Yiru Guo, Joseph B. Moore, et al.. (2017). Myocardial Reparative Properties of Cardiac Mesenchymal Cells Isolated on the Basis of Adherence. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 69(14). 1824–1838. 38 indexed citations
3.
Guo, Yiru, Marcin Wysoczynski, Yibing Nong, et al.. (2017). Repeated doses of cardiac mesenchymal cells are therapeutically superior to a single dose in mice with old myocardial infarction. Basic Research in Cardiology. 112(2). 18–18. 64 indexed citations
4.
Cai, Chuanxi, Yiru Guo, Lei Teng, et al.. (2015). Preconditioning Human Cardiac Stem Cells with an HO-1 Inducer Exerts Beneficial Effects After Cell Transplantation in the Infarcted Murine Heart. Stem Cells. 33(12). 3596–3607. 41 indexed citations
5.
Hong, Kyung U., Yiru Guo, Pengxiao Cao, et al.. (2014). c-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells Alleviate Post-Myocardial Infarction Left Ventricular Dysfunction Despite Poor Engraftment and Negligible Retention in the Recipient Heart. PLoS ONE. 9(5). e96725–e96725. 144 indexed citations
6.
Kukreja, Rakesh C., Xian‐Liang Tang, David J. Lefer, et al.. (2014). Administration of Sildenafil at Reperfusion Fails to Reduce Infarct Size: Results from the CAESAR Cardioprotection Consortium (LB650). The FASEB Journal. 28(S1). 13 indexed citations
7.
Lefer, David J., Steven P. Jones, Charles Steenbergen, et al.. (2014). Sodium Nitrite Fails to Limit Myocardial Infarct Size: Results from the CAESAR Cardioprotection Consortium (LB645). The FASEB Journal. 28(S1). 15 indexed citations
8.
Guo, Yiru, Deepali Tukaye, Xiaoping Zhu, et al.. (2012). The COX-2/PGI2 Receptor Axis Plays an Obligatory Role in Mediating the Cardioprotection Conferred by the Late Phase of Ischemic Preconditioning. PLoS ONE. 7(7). e41178–e41178. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026