Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Implantation of stimulated homologous macrophages results in partial recovery of paraplegic rats
1998630 citationsEti Yoles, Michael Belkin et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Belkin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Belkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Belkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Belkin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Belkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Belkin. The network helps show where Michael Belkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Belkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Belkin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Belkin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Belkin. Michael Belkin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yehezkel, Oren, et al.. (2018). An objective rapid system based on eye tracking for eye deviation measurement in children and adults. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 1024–1024.2 indexed citations
3.
Belkin, Michael, Noa Geffen, Shay Ofir, et al.. (2013). Direct Trans-Scleral Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) Without a Gonioscopy Lens. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(13). 1863–1863.4 indexed citations
4.
Zalevsky, Zeev, Yevgeny Beiderman, Alon Skaat, et al.. (2012). Remote and Continuous Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure Using Novel Photonic Principle. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 1972–1972.4 indexed citations
Yehezkel, Oren, et al.. (2008). Omni-Focal Refractive Correction Lens -A Potential Substitute for Bi/Multi-Focal Lenses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 1798–1798.1 indexed citations
9.
Yehezkel, Oren, et al.. (2008). A Novel Myopia Correcting Lens Which Reduces the Need for Accommodation for Near Vision Tasks. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 1799–1799.1 indexed citations
10.
Nelson, D. A., et al.. (2006). Reduction of the Variance of Blood–Flow Velocity Measurements by Triggering on the Heartbeat–Cycle Phase. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 2650–2650.1 indexed citations
11.
Belokopytov, Mark, et al.. (2006). Neuroprotective Treatment With NAP Reduces Laser–Induced Retinal Damage in Rats. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 4820–4820.1 indexed citations
Mandel, Yossi, Michael Belkin, & Uri Polat. (2004). Fast adaptation of foveal scotopic contrast sensitivity and effect of aging. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 5459–5459.2 indexed citations
14.
Sellem, E, et al.. (2002). The Ex-PRESSTM Miniature Glaucoma Implant in Combined Surgery with Cataract Extraction: Prospective Study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 3348–3348.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.