Metha Meetam

21 papers receiving 674 citations

Peers

Metha Meetam
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pollution 167
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 161
  • Plant Science 308
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 103
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 45
Replace Zhiming Kong with:
Zhiming Kong China
Kun Qiao China
Ahmed A. Issa Egypt
Zhaoyang Chang China
Eduardo Feijão Portugal
Pannaga Pavan Jutur India
G. Archana India
Poonam Bhargava India
Ekhlaque A. Khan India
Khanjan Trivedi India
Metha Meetam relative to Zhiming Kong China Zhiming Kong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Zhiming Kong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Metha Meetam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Metha Meetam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Metha Meetam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metha Meetam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Metha Meetam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Metha Meetam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Metha Meetam. The network helps show where Metha Meetam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Metha Meetam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Metha Meetam Line = papers co-authored together Metha Meetam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008204
2 201477
3 201845
4 201645
5 201942
6 201336
7 201135
8 199930
9 201629
10 201625
11 201722
12 201517
13
Phytoremediation potential of Cd and Zn by wetland plants, Colocasia esculenta L. Schott., Cyperus malaccensis Lam. and Typha angustifolia L. grown in hydroponics.
201517
14 201914
15 202010
16 201710
17 20179
18 20217
19 20154
20 20224

About Metha Meetam

Metha Meetam is a scholar working on Pollution, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 21 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heavy metals in environment (6 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (5 papers), Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment (5 papers), Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (3 papers), Trace Elements in Health (3 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (3 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (2 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (167 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (161 citations), Plant Science (308 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (103 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (45 citations). Metha Meetam has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Woei‐Jiun Guo, Peter B. Goldsbrough, Prayad Pokethitiyook, Maleeya Kruatrachue, Kittisak Yokthongwattana, Vanvimon Saksmerprome, Synan F. AbuQamar, Wenqiao Yuan, Sarocha Jitrakorn and Siripong Thitamadee. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Applied Phycology, Scientific Reports, Planta and International Journal of Phytoremediation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact