Meghan E Hughes

594 total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

Meghan E Hughes is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Meghan E Hughes has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 8 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Meghan E Hughes's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (12 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers). Meghan E Hughes is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (12 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers). Meghan E Hughes collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Canada. Meghan E Hughes's co-authors include Joel Pfeffer, Marta Reina-Campos, N. Bastian, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Robert A. Crain, Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez, Mélanie Chevance, Ana Bonaca, Marie Martig and Daniel A. Kane and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Meghan E Hughes

13 papers receiving 416 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Kraken reveals itself – the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations

2020 173 citations J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Joel Pfeffer et al. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society profile →

Peers

Meghan E Hughes

INSTR

ECOLO

PHYSI

Li Shao China

M. E. De Rossi Argentina

L. Spalsbury United States

Tomomi Sunayama Japan

Edward Gillen United Kingdom

Lindsey Davis United States

M. J. Henriksen United States

Moein Mosleh United States

Yu-Yen Chang Taiwan

Jianhang Chen Germany

Li Shao China

Meghan E Hughes

197 ×0.5

91 ×0.4

INSTR

3 ×0.1

ECOLO

15 ×0.6

8 ×0.5

PHYSI

Citations per year, relative to Meghan E Hughes Meghan E Hughes (= 1×) peers Li Shao

Countries citing papers authored by Meghan E Hughes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meghan E Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meghan E Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meghan E Hughes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meghan E Hughes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meghan E Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meghan E Hughes. The network helps show where Meghan E Hughes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meghan E Hughes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meghan E Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meghan E Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meghan E Hughes. Meghan E Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Reina-Campos, Marta, Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez, Alis J. Deason, et al.. (2022). Radial distributions of globular clusters trace their host dark matter halo: insights from the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 513(3). 3925–3945. 24 indexed citations

Hughes, Meghan E, Joel Pfeffer, N. Bastian, et al.. (2022). The physics governing the upper truncation mass of the globular cluster mass function. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 510(4). 6190–6200. 7 indexed citations

Trujillo-Gomez, Sebastian, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Marta Reina-Campos, et al.. (2021). The kinematics of globular cluster populations in the E-MOSAICS simulations and their implications for the assembly history of the Milky Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 503(1). 31–58. 22 indexed citations

Hughes, Meghan E, Prashin Jethwa, M. Hilker, et al.. (2021). What to expect when using globular clusters as tracers of the total mass distribution in Milky Way-mass galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 502(2). 2828–2844. 5 indexed citations

Reina-Campos, Marta, Meghan E Hughes, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, et al.. (2020). The mass fraction of halo stars contributed by the disruption of globular clusters in the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 493(3). 3422–3428. 16 indexed citations

Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik, Joel Pfeffer, Mélanie Chevance, et al.. (2020). Kraken reveals itself – the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 498(2). 2472–2491. 173 indexed citations breakdown →

Pfeffer, Joel, Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, et al.. (2020). Predicting accreted satellite galaxy masses and accretion redshifts based on globular cluster orbits in the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 499(4). 4863–4875. 28 indexed citations

Keller, Ben, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Joel Pfeffer, et al.. (2020). Where did the globular clusters of the Milky Way form? Insights from the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 495(4). 4248–4267. 29 indexed citations

Horta, Danny, Meghan E Hughes, Joel Pfeffer, et al.. (2020). Linking globular cluster formation at low and high redshift through the age–metallicity relation in E-MOSAICS. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 500(4). 4768–4778. 19 indexed citations

10.

Hughes, Meghan E, Joel Pfeffer, Marie Martig, et al.. (2019). The [α/Fe]–[Fe/H] relation in the E-MOSAICS simulations: its connection to the birth place of globular clusters and the fraction of globular cluster field stars in the bulge. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 491(3). 4012–4022. 30 indexed citations

11.

Pfeffer, Joel, N. Bastian, Robert A. Crain, et al.. (2019). The evolution of the UV luminosity function of globular clusters in the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487(4). 4550–4564. 16 indexed citations

12.

Hughes, Meghan E, Joel Pfeffer, Marie Martig, et al.. (2018). Fossil stellar streams and their globular cluster populations in the E-MOSAICS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 482(2). 2795–2806. 34 indexed citations

13.

Elustondo, Pía A., et al.. (2013). Physical and Functional Association of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) with Skeletal Muscle Mitochondria. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288(35). 25309–25317. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact