This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Smith. The network helps show where Meg Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meg Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meg Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meg Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Meg Smith. Meg Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Meg, et al.. (2017). Inclusion, reversal, or displacement? classofying regulatory approaches to pay equity.. Comparative labor law & policy journal. 39(1). 211–246.5 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Meg, et al.. (2017). Shall I compare thee to a fitter and turner? : the role of comparators in pay equity regulation. 30. 113–136.3 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Meg, et al.. (2016). Inclusion, Reversal or Displacement? Classifying Regulatory Approaches to Pay Equity. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Meg, et al.. (2014). Equal remuneration and the Social and Community Services case: progress or diversion on the road to pay equity?. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 27(1). 31–56.1 indexed citations
6.
Tannous, Kathy & Meg Smith. (2013). Access to Full-Time Employment: Does Gender Matter?. Australian journal of labour economics. 16(2). 237–257.3 indexed citations
Smith, Meg, et al.. (2010). A new dawn for pay equity? Developing an equal remuneration principle under the Fair Work Act. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).2 indexed citations
9.
Watson, Stuart, Peter Gallagher, Meg Smith, et al.. (2009). Efficacy of Mifepristone (RU-486) in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression. Biological Psychiatry.1 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Meg. (2009). Gender Pay Equity Reform in Australia: What is the Way Forward?. Australian bulletin of labour. 35(4). 652–670.1 indexed citations
Smith, Meg & M.F. Lyons. (2007). 2020 vision or 1920's myopia? Recent developments in gender pay equity in Australia. 13(2). 27.2 indexed citations
15.
Lyons, M.F. & Meg Smith. (2007). WorkChoices and pay equity. Hecate. 33(1). 81.1 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Meg & M.F. Lyons. (2006). Crying Wolf?: Employers, Awards and Pay Equity in the New South Wales Children's Services Industry. 6(1). 49.1 indexed citations
Lyons, M.F. & Meg Smith. (2006). Women, Wages and Industrial Relations in Australia: The Past, the Present and the Future. International journal of employment studies. 14(2). 1.2 indexed citations
19.
Berk, Michael, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Seetal Dodd, et al.. (2005). Impact of diagnostic definition on reported prevalence of mixed episodes in an Australian community bipolar cohort. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 39.1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Meg. (2003). Accepting mediocrity as progress : gender pay equity and enterprise bargaining. 9(1). 89.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.