M.E. Best

3.4k citations
45 papers · 2.8k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 24

M.E. Best

44 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

High K/sub u/ materials approach to 100 Gbits/in/sup 2/1.1k20002026200820172505007501000

Peers

M.E. Best
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.2k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.2k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 491
  • Structural Biology 53
  • Biomedical Engineering 706
Replace Kevin R. Coffey with:
Kevin R. Coffey United States
T. J. Klemmer United States
Shishou Kang China
Shuo Cheng United States
D.N. Lambeth United States
D. T. Margulies United States
Maciej Oskar Liedke Germany
T. T. Sheng United States
D. Goll Germany
N. Y. Jin-Phillipp Germany
M.E. Best relative to Kevin R. Coffey United States Kevin R. Coffey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kevin R. Coffey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.E. Best

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.E. Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.E. Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.E. Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.E. Best

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.E. Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.E. Best. The network helps show where M.E. Best may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.E. Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.E. Best Line = papers co-authored together M.E. Best links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20151
2 20050
3 200436
4 200327
5 20034
6 2002113
7 200261
8 200224
9 200164
10 200172
11 200169
12 200134
13 200055
14 200078
15 2000208
16 19972
17 19945
18 19934
19 19932
20 19912

About M.E. Best

M.E. Best is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 45 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (24 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (8 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (7 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (6 papers), Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques (5 papers) and Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.2k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (491 citations), Structural Biology (53 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (706 citations). M.E. Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. Moser, D. Weller, M. Doerner, L. Folks, B. D. Terris, Michael F. Toney, M. M. Schwickert, Jan-Ulrich Thiele, Wen Lee and Charles Rettner. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026