Max Pichler

2.1k citations
45 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Max Pichler

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Max Pichler
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 787
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 82
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 422
  • Oncology 351
  • Cancer Research 176
Replace Manabu Ogita with:
Manabu Ogita Japan
Luigi Tarantini Italy
Joshua M. Stolker United States
Shinya Okazaki Japan
Bjørn Bendz Norway
Margarita Lopatin United States
Shuta Tsuboi Japan
Ki Bae Seung South Korea
Daisuke Goto Japan
Vicent Bodı́ Spain
Max Pichler relative to Manabu Ogita Japan Manabu Ogita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Manabu Ogita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Pichler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Pichler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Pichler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Pichler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Pichler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Pichler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Pichler. The network helps show where Max Pichler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Pichler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Pichler Line = papers co-authored together Max Pichler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014241
2 1980147
3 1980143
4 2013126
5 1985104
6 200899
7 198697
8 201278
9 201049
10 199144
11 198341
12 199638
13 199935
14 198234
15 199424
16 197919
17 201319
18 199518
19 201316
20 200415

About Max Pichler

Max Pichler is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (10 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (787 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (82 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (422 citations), Oncology (351 citations) and Cancer Research (176 citations). Max Pichler has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Berman, Prediman K. Shah, H.J.C. Swan, Bramah N. Singh, Jamshid Maddahi, Armin Gerger, Tatjana Stojaković, Uwe Langsenlehner, Sabine Krenn-Pilko and Tanja Langsenlehner. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, British Journal of Cancer, American Heart Journal, Clinical & Translational Oncology and Clinical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact