Maurizio Pin
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Genetics
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Andrea Maria D’ArminiCatherine KlersyValentina GrazioliRoberto DoreAdele ValentiniMarco MorsoliniStefano GhioAlberto Tripodi
- Topics
- Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (15 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers)
- Journals
- European Respiratory JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryEuropean Radiology
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Maurizio Pin
20 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 186
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 164
- Internal Medicine 62
- Genetics 42
- Surgery 27
Countries citing papers authored by Maurizio Pin
This map shows the geographic impact of Maurizio Pin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maurizio Pin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maurizio Pin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maurizio Pin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maurizio Pin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maurizio Pin. The network helps show where Maurizio Pin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maurizio Pin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maurizio Pin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maurizio Pin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maurizio Pin. Maurizio Pin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 77 |
About Maurizio Pin
Maurizio Pin is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 221 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (15 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (62 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (164 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (186 citations). Maurizio Pin has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Maria D’Armini, Catherine Klersy, Valentina Grazioli, Roberto Dore, Adele Valentini, Marco Morsolini, Stefano Ghio, Alberto Tripodi, Elisa Mikus and Simona Secondino. Their work appears in journals such as European Respiratory Journal, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and European Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.