Maud Clemessy

626 citations
18 papers · 355 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Maud Clemessy

18 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Maud Clemessy
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 108
  • Urology 18
  • Dermatology 20
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 41
  • Molecular Biology 149
Replace Rieko Kominami with:
Rieko Kominami Japan
Martine Sinico France
Katsumi Goji Japan
Caterina Miro Italy
Jean‐Christophe Devedjian France
Sezer Acar Türkiye
Sabrina Rigutto Belgium
A. Boumédiène France
Márcio A. F. de Godoy United States
Mouna Mnif Tunisia
Maud Clemessy relative to Rieko Kominami Japan Rieko Kominami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Rieko Kominami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Maud Clemessy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Clemessy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Clemessy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Clemessy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Clemessy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Clemessy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Clemessy. The network helps show where Maud Clemessy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maud Clemessy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Maud Clemessy Line = papers co-authored together Maud Clemessy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200764
2 201251
3 200833
4 200831
5 200828
6 200628
7 201723
8 201118
9 201215
10 202013
11 201010
12 20189
13 20158
14 20237
15 20117
16 20155
17 20174
18 20121

About Maud Clemessy

Maud Clemessy is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (1 paper) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (108 citations), Urology (18 citations), Dermatology (20 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (41 citations) and Molecular Biology (149 citations). Maud Clemessy has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Frédéric Jaisser, Xavier Jeunemaı̂tre, Martine Imbert–Teboul, Anne-Marie Houot, Nicolette Farman, Céline Delaloy, Juliette Hadchouel, Yves Le Bouc, Laurent Kappeler and M Grossin. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal Of Pathology, Nutrients, Biochemical Pharmacology and Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact