Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Williams Stirling
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Williams Stirling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Williams Stirling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Williams Stirling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Williams Stirling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Williams Stirling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Williams Stirling. The network helps show where Matthew Williams Stirling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Williams Stirling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Williams Stirling.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Williams Stirling based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Williams Stirling. Matthew Williams Stirling is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Griffiths, Mary, John Hemmings, S.G. Alderson, et al.. (1992). SeaSoar CTD, fluorescence and scalar irradiance data from RRS Charles Darwin Cruises 58/59. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
2.
Pollard, Raymond T, J.F. Read, J. Smithers, & Matthew Williams Stirling. (1987). SeaSoar sections from the Antarctic Circumpolar Current at 52S, 32E to the Subtropical Front at 37S, 52E. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
3.
Coe, Michael D., David C. Grove, Elizabeth P. Benson, & Matthew Williams Stirling. (1981). The Olmec and Their Neighbors: Essays in Memory of Matthew W. Stirling. Medical Entomology and Zoology.45 indexed citations
Stirling, Matthew Williams. (1969). Solving the mystery of Mexico's great stone spheres. National geographic/The complete National geographic/The National geographic magazine. 136(2). 295–300.6 indexed citations
6.
Heizer, Robert F., et al.. (1968). Papers on Mesoamerican Archaeology. eScholarship (California Digital Library).4 indexed citations
7.
Stirling, Matthew Williams, et al.. (1964). El Limón, an early tomb site in Cocle; Province, Panama. DSpace Repository (Smithsonian).1 indexed citations
Stirling, Matthew Williams, et al.. (1961). National Geographic on Indians of the Americas : a color-illustrated record.1 indexed citations
10.
Stirling, Matthew Williams. (1960). The use of the atlatl on Lake Patzcuaro, Michoacan. DSpace Repository (Smithsonian).15 indexed citations
11.
Stirling, Matthew Williams. (1957). Monumentos de piedra de Río Chiquito, Veracruz, México. DSpace (Universidad Veracruzana).1 indexed citations
12.
Stirling, Matthew Williams. (1957). An archeological reconnaissance in Southeastern Mexico. DSpace Repository (Smithsonian).1 indexed citations
13.
Stirling, Matthew Williams. (1955). Stone monuments of the Río Chiquito, Veracruz, Mexico. DSpace Repository (Smithsonian).7 indexed citations
14.
Stirling, Matthew Williams. (1953). Hunting Prehistory in Panama jungles. National geographic/The complete National geographic/The National geographic magazine. 104(2). 271–290.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.