Matthew W. Doust

1.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
7 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Matthew W. Doust is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew W. Doust has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 4 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Matthew W. Doust's work include Pain Management and Treatment (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). Matthew W. Doust is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Treatment (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). Matthew W. Doust collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Matthew W. Doust's co-authors include Abram H. Burgher, Richard Bundschu, Bradford E. Gliner, Cong Yu, B. Todd Sitzman, Thomas P. Yang, Leonardo Kapural, Kasra Amirdelfan, Ramsin Benyamin and Thomas Yearwood and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Anesthesiology and Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Matthew W. Doust

7 papers receiving 950 citations

Hit Papers

Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Sup... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 2016 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew W. Doust United States 6 883 718 356 316 169 7 1.0k
Richard Paicius United States 9 596 0.7× 457 0.6× 187 0.5× 261 0.8× 120 0.7× 11 660
Denny Demeria Canada 6 503 0.6× 444 0.6× 146 0.4× 145 0.5× 90 0.5× 7 619
Farrokh Farrokhi United States 4 528 0.6× 511 0.7× 146 0.4× 142 0.4× 107 0.6× 4 643
Jane Shipley United States 11 483 0.5× 456 0.6× 157 0.4× 112 0.4× 90 0.5× 17 588
Laura Demartini Italy 14 314 0.4× 286 0.4× 90 0.3× 190 0.6× 67 0.4× 35 508
Elias Veizi United States 9 295 0.3× 310 0.4× 101 0.3× 101 0.3× 50 0.3× 16 482
Tilman Wolter Germany 14 287 0.3× 231 0.3× 96 0.3× 174 0.6× 48 0.3× 37 552
Aaron Calodney United States 13 228 0.3× 293 0.4× 97 0.3× 88 0.3× 42 0.2× 32 471
Bryan C. Hoelzer United States 13 237 0.3× 169 0.2× 76 0.2× 75 0.2× 30 0.2× 36 429
Kenneth B. Chapman United States 11 273 0.3× 239 0.3× 30 0.1× 191 0.6× 107 0.6× 42 397

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew W. Doust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew W. Doust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew W. Doust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew W. Doust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew W. Doust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew W. Doust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew W. Doust. The network helps show where Matthew W. Doust may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew W. Doust

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew W. Doust. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew W. Doust based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew W. Doust. Matthew W. Doust is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Turner, M., Peter Winkle, Nathan Segall, et al.. (2020). Immunogenicity and safety of lyophilized and liquid dengue tetravalent vaccine candidate formulations in healthy adults: a randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 16(10). 2456–2464. 24 indexed citations
2.
Amirdelfan, Kasra, Cong Yu, Matthew W. Doust, et al.. (2018). Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT. Quality of Life Research. 27(8). 2035–2044. 57 indexed citations
3.
Kapural, Leonardo, Cong Yu, Matthew W. Doust, et al.. (2016). Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain. Neurosurgery. 79(5). 667–677. 315 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Kidd, Brian, Gabriel E. Hoffman, Noah Zimmerman, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of direct-to-consumer low-volume lab tests in healthy adults. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 126(5). 1734–1744. 24 indexed citations
5.
Kapural, Leonardo, Cong Yu, Matthew W. Doust, et al.. (2015). Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain. Anesthesiology. 123(4). 851–860. 557 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Burgher, Abram H., et al.. (2011). Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation with Inter-lead Stimulation for Axial Neck and Low Back Pain: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 15(2). 100–107. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026